We performed a comparison between CloverETL and SSIS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Informatica, Oracle and others in Data Integration."No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"The most valuable feature of SSIS is its ease of use. It is easier to use than other applications."
"It has the ability to be deployed into the cloud through Data Factory, and run completely as a software as a service in the cloud."
"The simplicity of the solution is great. The solution also offers excellent integration."
"It's already very user-friendly and has a good dashboard."
"The most valuable feature of SSIS is that it can handle real complex transformations."
"The performance is better than doing it in some alternative ways. We don't have to worry about so much manual work."
"The most valuable features for our company are the flexibility and the quick turn around time in producing simple ETL solutions."
"The workflow features have been very valuable. You can have automated workflows and all the steps are controlled. The workflow functionality of integration services is excellent."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"There were some issues when we tried to connect it to data storage. It was a connection issue."
"This solution needs full support for real-time processing."
"The interface could use improvement, as well as the administrative tools. Jobs fail from time to time for different reasons. It's not a problem with Microsoft, or SSIS itself. The problems are external, but to find the problems and analyze them it takes too much time."
"We have issues with SSIS connectors while extracting data from Excel sources."
"I would like to see more features in terms of the integration with Azure Data Factory."
"We'd like them to develop data exploration more."
"SSIS can improve by the minimum code requirements in stored procedures and exporting data is difficult. They could make it easier, it should be as easy as it is to import data."
"The debugging could be improved because when it came to solving the errors that I've experienced in the past, I've had to look at the documentation for more information."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 60th in Data Integration while SSIS is ranked 2nd in Data Integration with 69 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while SSIS is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SSIS writes "Maintaining the solution and contacting its support team is easy". CloverETL is most compared with iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas SSIS is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Talend Open Studio, IBM InfoSphere DataStage, Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) and AWS Glue.
See our list of best Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.