We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"It's a very straightforward product that is well integrated with everything."
"Even though the data is already in the cloud, it's an AWS, so by accessing the on-prem appliance you can still search because it is indexed from that appliance."
"In terms of stability, the product is good."
"It has an easy-to-use interface that is not complicated."
"The solution is easy to install; our team just has to put together the plan, give it to IT and let them handle it. Other solutions are quite complex, but this is much simpler."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use for backing up VMs."
"The most valuable feature is the storage efficiency, as the storage footprint is very good."
"Rubrik Go is very simple to use."
"In the next release, I would like to see better prices for the licenses."
"Reporting could be improved. For now, it's only exported to CSB files."
"If you're going for Rubrik, you are not opting for the tape library because Rubrik doesn't have the fiber cable connected to the tape library."
"Being a modern backup solution, Rubrik should have an option to back up a Kubernetes cluster."
"If you were to compare it to, say, EMC, the availability of the documentation, training programs, and end-user education aren't as good. Rubrik could improve this."
"I would like to see better integration with applications, such as those from Microsoft, to make backing up from those applications simpler."
"Integration with the client is something that needs to be improved."
"You should be able to add more workloads to Rubrik Go."
"It's a perpetual license."
"This is a very costly solution."
"Rubrik Go is more cost-effective than similar solutions by other vendors."
"It's an expensive product if you compare it to traditional backup solutions; however, if you compare it as a total cost of ownership for a solution, it is not."
If yours is like most enterprise companies, backup is your single largest application in-house. That typically means you are running multiple legacy backup solutions (NetBackup, Commvault, Spectrum Protect, etc.) for various business units. This results in high administrative time and less-than-stellar data protection.
With Cobalt Iron’s backup SaaS solution, you can eliminate complexity, dramatically reduce the time you spend on backup, and significantly improve your data protection performance. The result is a comprehensive data protection solution that is flexible, manageable, and affordable.
Compass is a new approach to data protection harnessing analytics and automation to drive out cost and complexity while delivering reliable protection and valuable data insights to the business.
Automatic Access to New Technology: Customers receive the latest technology updates so that they can continue to innovate and stay one step ahead of their competition.
Future-Proof for Cloud: Go customers can migrate to the cloud at any time during their subscription term. If customers run cloud applications, they receive native cloud protection at no additional cost.
Lower Upfront Costs: Rubrik Go transforms large upfront capital expenditures into predictable subscription payments to help customers meet and exceed budget requirements.
Cobalt Iron is ranked 10th in SaaS Backup with 1 review while Rubrik Go is ranked 5th in SaaS Backup with 7 reviews. Cobalt Iron is rated 10.0, while Rubrik Go is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cobalt Iron writes "Well integrated, easy to install, stable, scalable and has good support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Rubrik Go writes "Has good VM features and good stability ". Cobalt Iron is most compared with , whereas Rubrik Go is most compared with Metallic, Clumio and AWS Backup.
See our list of best SaaS Backup vendors.
We monitor all SaaS Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.