Compare Code42 Next-Gen DLP vs. Digital Guardian

Code42 Next-Gen DLP is ranked 6th in Data Loss Prevention with 1 review while Digital Guardian is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention with 3 reviews. Code42 Next-Gen DLP is rated 9.0, while Digital Guardian is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Code42 Next-Gen DLP writes "Works in the background, allows individual users to perform restores". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital Guardian writes "The classification engine enables you to set up inspection rules to determine whether data has PII". Code42 Next-Gen DLP is most compared with CrowdStrike, Carbon Black CB Defense and Symantec Data Loss Prevention, whereas Digital Guardian is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and CrowdStrike.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Forcepoint, McAfee and others in Data Loss Prevention. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
Works in the background and users are able to perform restores.

Read more »

It can scale from 100 to 10,000. There's no problem with the scalability.In Digital Guardian, they have the cloud correlation servers that give you visibility work like EBR and the correlation server works very well for security analysis.The technical support is really terrific.

Read more »

Cons
I would like to see more flexibility on privileges, perhaps create another kind of admin for regions. Also, I would like the ability to access logs without having to be on the actual device or a super-admin.

Read more »

There are a lot of issues with the current version of the Endpoint agent. It's not stable, it's resource-consuming, and there are some performance issues. If they could improve the stability of the agent it would be great.The room for improvement with Digital Guardian is that it will be better with the Linux agent because it is the only DLP solution for Linux workstations. It still needs to upgrade the agents to the latest version for the Linux kernel.I would like to see the workflow, to get all the rules and policies set up, be less complicated.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
Digital Guardian has both, subscription and perpetual licenses, but I think when everything (all technologies) will go to the cloud they will only offer subscriptions.If I compare Digital Guardian with Symantec, the license cost is lower, but McAfee can be cheaper than Digital Guardian. It depends on how many licenses you plan to buy and how big the project is. The cost is not so high as Symantec, but not as cheap as McAfee. They can easily sell the solution for price.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
6th
Views
2,841
Comparisons
1,489
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
149
Avg. Rating
9.0
4th
Views
3,936
Comparisons
2,439
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
847
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 25% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Also Known As
Code42 Next-Gen Data Loss Protection, Code42 Forensic File Search, Code42 Backup + Restore
Learn
Code42
Digital Guardian
Overview
Code42, a leading provider of information security solutions, secures the ideas of more than 50,000 organizations worldwide, including the most recognized brands in business and education. Because Code42 collects and indexes every version of every file, the company offers security, legal and IT teams total visibility and recovery of data--wherever it lives and moves. With real-time alerts and forensics, these teams can easily detect, investigate, and rapidly recover from any data incident, such as ransomware, lost of stolen devices, and insider threats. Supported by a global state-of-the-art cloud infrastructure, the Code42 platform safeguards hundreds of petabytes of data and helps organizations comply with evolving regulatory environments. Founded in 2001, the company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and backed by Accel Partners, JMI Equity, NEA, and Split Rock Partners. For more information, visit code42.com.

Digital Guardian Endpoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data on all your endpoints. It protects intellectual property and personal information. An endpoint agent that captures and records all system, user and data events on or off the network. It has a granular control of all data movement that can be configured to automatically block, justify or encrypt sensitive data in or attached to email, files moved to removable drives, cloud storage, or web - malware and malware-free - before sensitive data is lost. It has a built-in advanced data classification that creates and modifies classification and usage policies through content inspection, context-awareness and user classification. It provides design policies with controls that won't block actions that comply with corporate policy so employees remain productive while the data stays safe.

Offer
Learn more about Code42 Next-Gen DLP
Learn more about Digital Guardian
Sample Customers
Adobe, Okta, Samsung, Taylormade, Boston University, Lending Club, North Highland, Stanford University, Ping Identity, Qualcomm, Pandora. The Fifth Avenue Theatre, Jabil Circuit
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
University19%
Healthcare Company11%
Real Estate/Law Firm8%
Non Profit8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company20%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Marketing Services Firm9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company33%
Comms Service Provider15%
Media Company7%
Government6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Symantec, Forcepoint, McAfee and others in Data Loss Prevention. Updated: March 2020.
407,401 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.