Compare Jama Connect vs. codeBeamer ALM

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
codeBeamer ALM Logo
1,915 views|1,357 comparisons
Jama Connect Logo
3,753 views|2,964 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. codeBeamer ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"CodeBeamer provides full traceability, excellent collaboration, regulatory compliance, and instant reporting with its holistic approach from requirement management to testing.""Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.""You can track the metrics in the Agile dashboard very easily.""The solution easily replaces IBM DOORS, which no longer offers maintenance in China.""The traceability is so simple that I don't need to do any additional configurations related to traceability."

More codeBeamer ALM Pros »

"Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful.""The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface."

More Jama Connect Pros »

Cons
"We would like to see more industry-specific features that are tailored to the vertical markets.""Usability needs to be improved.""I would like to see more, easily trackable reports.""The solution has a very small market share in China. It's almost like a startup.""The search and replace feature within the tool itself could be improved."

More codeBeamer ALM Cons »

"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects.""t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information.""I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved."

More Jama Connect Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Pricing is good when compared to similar ALM solutions.""It is reasonably priced and in accordance with the industry standards.""They're not the most expensive product on the market, but they're not the cheapest either — I'd say codeBeamer ALM is moderately priced."

More codeBeamer ALM Pricing and Cost Advice »

"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews."

More Jama Connect Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites solutions are best for your needs.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Since implementing this solution we have better communication and information exchange with customers.
Top Answer: Usability needs to be improved.
Top Answer: I use this solution for requirement management, task tracking, bug tracking, and change tracking.
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface.
Top Answer: I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved. For example, listing the pricing structure… more »
Top Answer: I use Jama Connect for requirement management.
Ranking
Views
1,915
Comparisons
1,357
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
513
Rating
8.0
Views
3,753
Comparisons
2,964
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
435
Rating
7.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 22% of the time.
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 24% of the time.
Learn
Intland Software
Jama
Overview

codeBeamer ALM is a market-leading Application Lifecycle Management platform. It is holistically integrated, and is packed with features that help you develop better products faster. Scale, monitor, control, and report on your entire development lifecycle conveniently, and comply with safety-critical regulations. Cut development time and costs.

Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation.
Offer
Learn more about codeBeamer ALM
Learn more about Jama Connect
Sample Customers
Medtronic, Align Technology, Daimler, Samsung, Harman, DassaultDeloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider22%
Computer Software Company19%
Manufacturing Company14%
Educational Organization12%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider12%
Healthcare Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. codeBeamer ALM and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

codeBeamer ALM is ranked 16th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 5 reviews while Jama Connect is ranked 18th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 3 reviews. codeBeamer ALM is rated 8.0, while Jama Connect is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of codeBeamer ALM writes "A plethora of advantages in a single, secure environment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". codeBeamer ALM is most compared with Jira, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Polarion ALM, PTC Integrity and IBM Rational ALM, whereas Jama Connect is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, Polarion Requirements, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation. See our Jama Connect vs. codeBeamer ALM report.

See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.

We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.