Compare Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements
Jama Connect is ranked 4th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Polarion Requirements is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 7.0, while Polarion Requirements is rated 5.4. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Well-structured, but the import feature and the dashboards need to be improved". Jama Connect is most compared with JIRA, IBM Rational DOORS and Polarion Requirements, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, JIRA and Jama Connect. See our Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements report.
Most Helpful Review | |||
| |||
 Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: January 2020. 399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface. Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful. | A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization. I like the way this solution is structured. The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now. |
Cons | |
I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved. t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information. Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects. | It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts. If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable. The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews. | Information Not Available |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs. 399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 4,421 Comparisons 3,646 Reviews 2 Average Words per Review 509 Avg. Rating 8.0 | Views 3,082 Comparisons 2,709 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 513 Avg. Rating 5.3 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 28% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 10% of the time. | Compared 38% of the time. Compared 35% of the time.  Compared 13% of the time. |
Learn | |
| Jama | Siemens |
Overview | |
| Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation. | Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Jama Connect | Learn more about Polarion Requirements |
Sample Customers | |
| Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University | NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation |
Top Industries | |
Manufacturing Company25% Software R&D Company24% Comms Service Provider7% Healthcare Company7% | Manufacturing Company35% Software R&D Company19% Comms Service Provider16% Retailer7% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: January 2020.
399,230 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also Jama Connect Reviews, Polarion Requirements Reviews, and our list of Best Application Requirements Management Companies.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.