Compare Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
"Technical support answers fairly quickly compared to others like IBM or Atlassian. They also offer quite a good knowledge base for advanced cases and how to plan it, etc. via videos that they provide. They are quite useful." "The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface." | "The biggest improvement would be in the transparency we have now. We have very complex products. We make whole systems with difficult and diverse areas such as hardware, software, mechanical and printing, etc. To get the overview of all the requirements into a system, at that sizing, is the main advantage we have in the organization now." "I like the way this solution is structured." "A valuable feature from my side would be the comparison corporization." "Its flexibility and APIs are the most valuable." |
Cons | |
"Test management can be improved. It's not so scalable. The user interface needs to split things into small projects." "t is rather slow, so the speed of the process and consuming information should be improved. It doesn't have a nice way of viewing information. We would like to see better interfaces for consuming information." "I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved." | "The one thing I would mention is the license policy is a little bit difficult. For different roles, you will need different license models. That seems a little bit difficult for us. Especially when you introduce such a complex system, you want to know the right way is to do licensing. It's not clear what that best way would be. The solution will be here for a long time, and I just think it could be more clear." "If we have more than one thousand work items in one live-book then it becomes almost unusable." "It is stable enough but if you would like to work with more requirement objects, then you will get timeouts." "Its user interface could be more user friendly. In addition, a lot of features are missing for test management. It should have the test case ordering feature." |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
"To have a single source for all the requirements and all the change requests our company gets is the most valuable feature. It has also helped us to keep track of reviews." | "It is expensive but not for what it is. It is just the right price for what it is. Its price is also similar to other solutions." |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Requirements Management solutions are best for your needs. 456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Questions from the Community | |
Top Answer: The most valuable feature is the user-friendly interface. Top Answer: I have inquired about pricing for this solution but have not yet heard anything, so their response time in this regard is something that should be improved. For example, listing the pricing structure… more » Top Answer: I use Jama Connect for requirement management. | Ask a question Earn 20 points |
Ranking  | |
Views 3,753 Comparisons 2,964 Reviews 3 Average Words per Review 435 Rating 7.0 | Views 2,864 Comparisons 2,370 Reviews 4 Average Words per Review 472 Rating 6.0 |
Popular Comparisons | |
 Compared 29% of the time.  Compared 24% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time.  Compared 6% of the time. Compared 5% of the time. | Compared 36% of the time. Compared 32% of the time. Compared 13% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time.  Compared 2% of the time. |
Learn | |
| Jama | Siemens |
Overview | |
| Web-based requirements management application designed to help you increase collaboration, manage complexity and fuel innovation. | Polarion REQUIREMENTS is designed from the ground for highly effective, transparent and secure collaboration, while teams have the option to work in their familiar environments. |
Offer | |
Learn more about Jama Connect | Learn more about Polarion Requirements |
Sample Customers | |
| Deloitte, SpaceX, Omnigon, Delft University | NetSuite, Ottobock, Zumtobel Group, Kªster Automotive GmbH, Sirona Dental Systems, LifeWatch, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), PHOENIX CONTACT Electronics GmbH, Metso Corporation |
Top Industries | |
Computer Software Company21% Manufacturing Company18% Comms Service Provider12% Healthcare Company8% | Manufacturing Company27% Computer Software Company20% Comms Service Provider18% Healthcare Company5% |
Find out what your peers are saying about Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Jama Connect is ranked 6th in Application Requirements Management with 3 reviews while Polarion Requirements is ranked 7th in Application Requirements Management with 4 reviews. Jama Connect is rated 7.0, while Polarion Requirements is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Jama Connect writes "An excellent cloud solution that is a very user friendly and mature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Polarion Requirements writes "Well-structured, but the import feature and the dashboards need to be improved". Jama Connect is most compared with Jira, IBM Rational DOORS, codeBeamer ALM, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, whereas Polarion Requirements is most compared with IBM Rational DOORS, Jira, IBM Rational DOORS Next Generation, Helix ALM and PTC Integrity Requirements Connector. See our Jama Connect vs. Polarion Requirements report.
See our list of best Application Requirements Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Requirements Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.