• Home
  • CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] vs. GoCD

CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] vs GoCD comparison

    Cancel
    You must select at least 2 products to compare!
    Cohesive Networks Logo

    CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL]

    views| comparisons
    Thoughtworks Logo

    GoCD

    Read 6 GoCD reviews
    207 views|166 comparisons
    87% willing to recommend
    Featured Review
    Use CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL]?
    Dmytro Kutetskyi
    User-friendly interface, good integration with LDAP, and has an easily-extendable open architecture
    GoCD provides a good UI for development, QA, release, and management teams to be able to deliver new application versions in a transparent and... Read more →
    Quotes From Members
    We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
    Here are some excerpts of what they said:
    Pricing and Cost Advice
    Information Not Available
  • "It's an open-source and free tool."
  • "This is an open-source solution and it is inexpensive."

    • More GoCD Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Emerging Solutions solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    What do you like most about GoCD?
    Top Answer:The UI is colorful.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GoCD?
    Top Answer:The product is free of cost.
    Read all 3 answers   →
    What needs improvement with GoCD?
    Top Answer:Jenkins is overtaking the product. The product must enhance user experience. Jenkins has everything in a simple XML format. However, GoCD is complex. Upgrading it to a simpler language would be… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In Emerging Solutions
    14th
    out of 35 in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites
    Views
    207
    Comparisons
    166
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    631
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    More CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] Competitors   →
    GitLab logo
    GitLab vs. GoCD
    Compared 30% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Tekton vs. GoCD
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Microsoft Azure DevOps logo
    Microsoft Azure DevOps vs. GoCD
    Compared 14% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    GitHub Actions vs. GoCD
    Compared 12% of the time.
    CircleCI logo
    CircleCI vs. GoCD
    Compared 8% of the time.
    More GoCD Competitors   →
    Also Known As
    Elastic Server
    Adaptive ALM, Thoughtworks Go
    Learn More
    Cohesive Networks
    Thoughtworks
    Overview

    Elastic Server simplifies the process of creating application stacks for use on EC2 and other virtual environments. Instead of the painstaking manual downloading, configuration, building, and installation that is otherwise required when creating a complex stack, Elastic Server provides a menu-driven selection and build process.

    GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers businesses a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility. It was designed for continuous delivery and the concepts essential to this practice are built in at the core.
    Sample Customers
    Geezeo, PayNearMe, AngelEye Camera Systems, CodeObjects, Imagination, MTech Communications, Quantum Retail, Trek10, Foley Carrier Services
    Ancestry.com, Barclay Card, AutoTrader, BT Financial Group, Gamesys, Nike, Vodafone, Haufe Lexware, Medidata, Hoovers
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Retailer10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise38%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%

    CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Emerging Solutions while GoCD is ranked 14th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 6 reviews. CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is rated 0.0, while GoCD is rated 7.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of GoCD writes "User-friendly, useful multiple pipeline capabilities, and low resource consumption". CohesiveFT Elastic Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas GoCD is most compared with GitLab, Tekton, Microsoft Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions and CircleCI.

    We monitor all Emerging Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.