• Home
  • Comindware Tracker vs. Fabasoft PROCECO

Comindware Tracker vs Fabasoft PROCECO comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comindware Logo

Comindware Tracker

Read 15 Comindware Tracker reviews
295 views|114 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Fabasoft Logo

Fabasoft PROCECO

181 views|119 comparisons
Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
March 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and Fabasoft PROCECO based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Nisha Senarathne
Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop
In my department, this software is extremely useful. It is great for keeping everybody in the loop. Projects are also released much more quickly... Read more →
Use Fabasoft PROCECO?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Price per user works for me when they do not count my clients, which fill forms."
  • "Setup cost is reasonable and average on the market. They offer simple licensing and price per user."
  • "The price is so reasonable."
  • "I benefit from this software by getting a variety of reporting options and features for a relatively low cost"
  • "The pricing and licensing is as per market standards, except that the process of extending licenses is also easy."
  • "This solution has a very lost cost."
  • "Great value for the money."

    • More Comindware Tracker Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    46th
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    295
    Comparisons
    114
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    51st
    out of 93 in Business Process Management (BPM)
    Views
    181
    Comparisons
    119
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Comindware
    Fabasoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Non-coding workflow software for business process modelling and management, automation of business operations, and workflow productivity boost. Minimize dependency on IT and allows non-technical users to design, run and modify Workflows with drag-and-drop simplicity.

    A wide variety of workflow management solutions have been built with Comindware Tracker across all industries, departments, and workflow scenarios and brought transparency and accountability in businesses.

    Key benefits of Comindware Workflow Software:

    • Quick workflow setup with no IT resource required
    • On-the-fly changes to workflows, forms, and data
    • Easy implementation thanks to the Outlook-style interface
    • Unified Document and Data Management
    • Advanced analytics and reporting for effective Workflow Management
    • Cloud, on-premises and hybrid deployment

    The Workflow Management system enables non-code addition and modification of workflows with no interruption to ongoing activities. It ensures quick-win implementation and reduces expenses.


    Fabasoft is a software company that provides solutions for business process automation and management. Its products are used by organizations of all sizes to improve their efficiency, productivity, and compliance. Fabasoft's core product is Fabasoft PROCECO, a business process management (BPM) platform. PROCECO helps organizations to automate their business processes, from simple workflows to complex processes that involve multiple departments and systems. PROCECO also includes features for process modeling, execution, monitoring, and analysis.
    Sample Customers
    Anthem, Hertz, Aetna, CVS Pharmacy, Covidien, Quicken Loans, Associated British Ports, United Card Services
    Novell GmbH, Red Hat, EMC_ Computer Systems Austria, GRAU Storage Data AG, Microsoft Corporation, Network Appliance, Cisco Systems Austria GmbH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization57%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Comms Service Provider4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise21%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise25%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM) while Fabasoft PROCECO is ranked 51st in Business Process Management (BPM). Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while Fabasoft PROCECO is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas Fabasoft PROCECO is most compared with .

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.