We performed a comparison between Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection and Trellix Endpoint Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to set up. I would rate my experience with the initial setup a ten out of ten, with ten being very easy to set up."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"he solution is an anti-malware product that integrates well with other vendor products such as firewalls, SIEM, etc. It captures threat intelligence and gives you better visibility. The product also has sandboxing features."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is the management of end-user machines."
"It is a very stable solution, making it an excellent product."
"It's a very easy-to-use product."
"It's user-friendly, compatible, and accessible."
"The product’s valuable feature is the remote control station."
"It's stable and reliable."
"The tool is an open-source EDR with antivirus features. It also has remote support and patch management."
"Containment is the best feature of the solution."
"It provides a robust defense against cybersecurity threats while offering user-friendly features like notifications and approval prompts."
"Trellix Endpoint Security's dashboard is very flexible, and I can create my own user-specific dashboard depending on user privilege or preference."
"The most valuable features of the solution include DLP (data loss prevention), CASB (cloud access security broker) functionality, endpoint encryption, and cloud workload security."
"McAfee EndPoint Security has a lot of good features that work well if they are implemented properly."
"The most valuable features are reporting from the ePO console and the advanced threat protection (ATP)."
"The solution is reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Trellix Endpoint Security is containment, which takes less than a minute."
"The most valuable features are the prevention layer that detects the signature value and prevents threats in the network."
"They can include the automation for the realtime updates. We have a network infrastructure with remote sites. Whenever they send updates, they are not automated. We have to go into the console and push those updates. I wish it was more automated. The update file is currently around 31 MB. It could be smaller."
"The solution should address emerging threats like SQL injection."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The support needs improvement."
"Making the portal mobile friendly would be helpful when I am out of office."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"The menu could be cleaned up."
"They need to just modernize the infrastructure with something that is next-generation. We have recently moved to SentinelOne. It had been doing good for us for a while, but we needed something modern with new technology."
"The product must provide a web filter to block websites based on specific categories."
"Their support is not very good because they are very late to reply."
"The licensing fees are high. The company should work to try to lower them for the customer."
"There are a few minor issues such as package updates and passwords."
"The solution's online documentation needs to be fine-tuned. It is not up to which solution currently has. There is some inconsistency in the knowledge present. I would like to see MDM in the solution's future releases."
"The quality of the analysis and the product dashboard is a bit low compared to other providers."
"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly. There are multiple solutions and there is no clear line differentiating all of them. There is a centralized console where we manage everything but most of the administrators feel a little confused when it comes to managing multiple products from a single place."
"The local technical support could be better."
"Some agents become old and then they don't communicate well any longer."
"They can make it free, but that's not going to happen."
"The interface is complex."
"I've encountered minor challenges related to encryption."
"It would be nice if the solution were to allow not just on-cloud management, but on-premises, as well."
"There are times the solution has some additional software added that is not fully integrated properly, such as Exchange Group Sheild. It is quite old and is not fully integrated properly and could be improved."
More Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection Pricing and Cost Advice →
Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is ranked 33rd in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 9 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security is ranked 12th in EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) with 20 reviews. Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is rated 8.2, while Trellix Endpoint Security is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection writes "Its sandboxing features help ensure security for us and our customers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security writes "An informative dashboard and immediate reporting and notifications ". Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Fortinet FortiClient and ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Secure Endpoint. See our Comodo Advanced Endpoint Protection vs. Trellix Endpoint Security report.
See our list of best EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) vendors.
We monitor all EPP (Endpoint Protection for Business) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.