Comodo cWatch vs Instart Web Security [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xcitium Logo
338 views|244 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Akamai Logo
views| comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and Instart Web Security [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Ranking
Views
338
Comparisons
244
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Unranked
In Web Application Firewall (WAF)
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
cWatch
Learn More
Akamai
Video Not Available
Overview

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

Instart Web Security is designed to secure your web apps from the dangers of the public web. All entry points into your application servers, whether it be your website, your APIs, or your web apps can be protected and secured with Instart Web Security. Instart provides protection across the entire traffic path for your application — from inside the browser where customers and attackers interact with your site, to the edge, all the way to your cloud or physical application infrastructure. The result is end-to-end protection for your web apps that is capable of preventing even the most sophisticated attack from taking down your site or gaining access to sensitive data.

Sample Customers
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Wholesaler/Distributor12%
Manufacturing Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comodo cWatch is ranked 35th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while Instart Web Security [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while Instart Web Security [EOL] is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas Instart Web Security [EOL] is most compared with .

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.