Comodo cWatch vs SonicWall Web Application Firewall comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Xcitium Logo
338 views|244 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SonicWall Logo
160 views|116 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Comodo cWatch and SonicWall Web Application Firewall based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF).
To learn more, read our detailed Web Application Firewall (WAF) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The solution is pretty stable. I've never faced pressing issues or hanging issue.""The FIM feature, the information in the new management system, and their support are the most valuable features. The scanned results are quite fast as compared to other platforms compared to scanning timing. It takes about a minute or two minutes. Also, the results of the Comodo scan results are in detail."

More Comodo cWatch Pros →

"We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling.""The solution offers better data protection than competitors.""Capture ATP is a good additional feature in the latest version."

More SonicWall Web Application Firewall Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to build better performance, specifically in the hardware resources.""A small problem is from the support team. Sometimes they are a bit delayed."

More Comodo cWatch Cons →

"We have a lot of unknown errors popping up in the latest version.""The solution needs an access management feature with API integration so we can assign certain levels of access within groups.""We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS."

More SonicWall Web Application Firewall Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Application Firewall (WAF) solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:We use SonicWall Web Application Firewall for security and tunneling.
Top Answer:We should get the logs from the solution, and it should communicate with the local DNS. There is some lag in the solution's technical support response time.
Top Answer:Our company uses the solution to protect our website that is for internal resources only and does not allow enterprise access.
Ranking
Views
338
Comparisons
244
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
160
Comparisons
116
Reviews
3
Average Words per Review
252
Rating
9.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
cWatch
Learn More
Overview

Cwatch delivers robust website protection from hackers - while it helps you stay calm when online. It does not just stop with protection but helps in scanning the website to remove malware instantly. It is a complete website security tool that delivers state-of-the-art protection techniques to ensure SMB website security from simple to complex threat landscape. It ensures early threat detection, instant solution and sophisticated preventive measures.

The SonicWall Web Application Firewal l (WAF) solutions enables the defense-in-depth strategy to protect your web applications running in a private, public or hybrid cloud environment. compromise the application, steal data and/or cause a denial-of-service.

Sample Customers
Xerox, Intel, HP, UPS, Western Union, Western Digital
AMANZIMTOTI HIGH SCHOOL
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company14%
Comms Service Provider14%
Wholesaler/Distributor12%
Manufacturing Company10%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise38%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Web Application Firewall (WAF)
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Updated: April 2024.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comodo cWatch is ranked 35th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is ranked 25th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 3 reviews. Comodo cWatch is rated 9.6, while SonicWall Web Application Firewall is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Comodo cWatch writes "Excellent security, good encryption, and pretty stable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SonicWall Web Application Firewall writes "A stable and durable solution that can be used for security and tunneling". Comodo cWatch is most compared with Cloudflare, Atomic ModSecurity Rules, Sucuri and AWS WAF, whereas SonicWall Web Application Firewall is most compared with Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.

See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.

We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.