CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox
As of May 2019, CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Advanced Threat Protection with 61 reviews vs Fortinet FortiSandbox which is ranked 11th in Advanced Threat Protection with 2 reviews. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Detects new threats but could be faster and less complex". CyberArk PAS is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management. Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Check Point SandBlast and FireEye Network Security. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
Add to compare
Most Helpful Review | |||||
|
| ||||
 Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: May 2019. 339,526 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |||||
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros | |
For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks. The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task. There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product. We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant. We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability. This solution is quite stable. The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out. I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature. | One of the valuable features is its ability to detect new threats. You have access to a report as to what behaviors the example file entered in the registry. |
Cons | |
Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server. Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use. The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it. Make it easier to deploy. I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution. There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar. If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature. Tech support staff can be more proactive. | The product is good but it could be speedier. In addition, it's quite complex. For additional features, maybe a form of execution pain files in a non-virtual environment because it has threats that identify when it is being run in a virtual machine. |
Pricing and Cost Advice | |
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product. This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today. I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product. No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product. Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect. With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time. If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it. Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low. | There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. |
 Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs. 339,526 professionals have used our research since 2012. | |
Ranking  | |
Views 42,726 Comparisons 15,621 Reviews 60 Average Words per Review 538 Avg. Rating 8.9 | Views 3,432 Comparisons 1,838 Reviews 1 Average Words per Review 225 Avg. Rating 9.0 |
Top Comparisons | |
 Compared 10% of the time.  Compared 9% of the time.  Compared 8% of the time. |  Compared 29% of the time.  Compared 19% of the time.  Compared 18% of the time. |
Also Known As | |
| CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager | |
Learn | |
| CyberArk | Fortinet |
Overview | |
CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution. | Today’s threats are increasingly sophisticated and often bypass traditional malware security by masking their malicious activity. A sandbox augments your security architecture by validating threats in a separate, secure environment. FortiSandbox offers a powerful combination of advanced detection, automated mitigation, actionable insight, and flexible deployment to stop targeted attacks and subsequent data loss. It's also a key component of our Advanced Threat Protection solution. |
Offer | |
Learn more about CyberArk PAS | Learn more about Fortinet FortiSandbox |
Sample Customers | |
| Rockwell Automation | Lush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG |
Top Industries | |
Financial Services Firm28% Insurance Company15% Healthcare Company10% Comms Service Provider8% Financial Services Firm32% Retailer13% Comms Service Provider10% Energy/Utilities Company9% | No Data Available |
Company Size | |
Small Business17% Midsize Enterprise9% Large Enterprise74% Small Business11% Midsize Enterprise12% Large Enterprise77% | No Data Available |
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: May 2019.
339,526 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See also CyberArk PAS Reviews, Fortinet FortiSandbox Reviews, and our list of Best Advanced Threat Protection Companies.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post
reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference
with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign in to see all reviews and comparisons. It's free!
By clicking Sign in with LinkedIn™ you agree to let IT Central Station use your LinkedIn profile
and email address in accordance with our Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms of Service.
- Unlimited access to 25000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign in.
By registering, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.
- Unlimited access to 25000+ reviews from real users
- Your own page to promote your professional skills
- Networking events and peer-to-peer consultations
Already a member? Sign In.