Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 50 reviews while Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 9th in Advanced Threat Protection with 9 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Provides very good security and is easily adaptable to customer requirements ". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and SailPoint IdentityIQ, whereas Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Check Point SandBlast and FireEye Network Security. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk PAS Logo
34,332 views|16,721 comparisons
Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
2,664 views|1,884 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.

Read more »

The initial setup is straightforward.The analysis engine is a very valuable feature.What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use.The technical support is very good.he solution's GUI is good.The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails.The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most.The most valuable feature was the EDR, endpoint detection and response.

Read more »

Cons
There is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.

Read more »

The integration is limited. The solution needs to offer better integration with multiple vendors.Product could include a user interface and be made simpler for customers to configure.Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection.Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product.At least once a week we have a false alarm. This needs to be adjusted so that we get fewer of these occurrences.The response time from technical support should be improved.The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified.In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

The solution is not expensive at all.There are additional costs, which isn't included in the licensing fee.There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
34,332
Comparisons
16,721
Reviews
48
Average Words per Review
688
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
2,664
Comparisons
1,884
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
361
Avg. Rating
7.8
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk
Fortinet
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Today’s threats are increasingly sophisticated and often bypass traditional malware security by masking their malicious activity. A sandbox augments your security architecture by validating threats in a separate, secure environment. FortiSandbox offers a powerful combination of advanced detection, automated mitigation, actionable insight, and flexible deployment to stop targeted attacks and subsequent data loss. It's also a key component of our Advanced Threat Protection solution.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Fortinet FortiSandbox
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationLush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company9%
Energy/Utilities Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm9%
Retailer6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company36%
Comms Service Provider14%
Media Company12%
University10%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise72%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business8%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise87%
REVIEWERS
Small Business44%
Midsize Enterprise33%
Large Enterprise22%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
406,860 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.