Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 53 reviews while Fortinet FortiSandbox is ranked 10th in Advanced Threat Protection with 8 reviews. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiSandbox writes "Good endpoint detection and response, but it needs better technical support". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), whereas Fortinet FortiSandbox is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Check Point SandBlast and FireEye Network Security. See our CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk PAS Logo
30,366 views|15,822 comparisons
Fortinet FortiSandbox Logo
2,486 views|1,802 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.We are able to know who is accessing what and when; having accountability.This solution is quite stable.The most valuable feature is that it always provides flexibility, password quality and one-time user check-in and check-out.I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature.

Read more »

What I find most valuable, is that it is easy to use.The technical support is very good.he solution's GUI is good.The solution is very good because it catches a lot of threats in emails.The most valuable feature is the protection and the way it works, the technology is what I like the most.The most valuable feature was the EDR, endpoint detection and response.One of the valuable features is its ability to detect new threats.You have access to a report as to what behaviors the example file entered in the registry.

Read more »

Cons
Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.Make it easier to deploy.I think having a distributed architecture would certainly help this solution.There was a functionality of the solution that was missing. I had noticed it in Beyond Trust, but not in this solution. But, recently they have incorporated something similar.If we could have some kind of out-of-the box feature that you can simply say "no" so they don't have to go into a development mode, that would a really helpful feature.Tech support staff can be more proactive.

Read more »

Something that needs to improve, is the end-point protection.Most people are confused about how to use the right integration of the right Fortinet product.At least once a week we have a false alarm. This needs to be adjusted so that we get fewer of these occurrences.The response time from technical support should be improved.The licensing can be very confusing. It needs to be simplified.In the next release, I would like to see machine learning and anti-exploitation included.The product is good but it could be speedier. In addition, it's quite complex.For additional features, maybe a form of execution pain files in a non-virtual environment because it has threats that identify when it is being run in a virtual machine.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.

Read more »

The solution is not expensive at all.There are additional costs, which isn't included in the licensing fee.There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
30,366
Comparisons
15,822
Reviews
51
Average Words per Review
571
Avg. Rating
9.0
Views
2,486
Comparisons
1,802
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
320
Avg. Rating
7.5
Top Comparisons
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege Manager
Learn
CyberArk
Fortinet
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Today’s threats are increasingly sophisticated and often bypass traditional malware security by masking their malicious activity. A sandbox augments your security architecture by validating threats in a separate, secure environment. FortiSandbox offers a powerful combination of advanced detection, automated mitigation, actionable insight, and flexible deployment to stop targeted attacks and subsequent data loss. It's also a key component of our Advanced Threat Protection solution.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Fortinet FortiSandbox
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationLush, Barnabas Health, Options, Riverside Healthcare, Hillsbourough County Schools, Columbia Public Schools, Schiller AG
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company15%
Healthcare Company10%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company26%
Financial Services Firm15%
Comms Service Provider11%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business16%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise79%
REVIEWERS
Small Business57%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise14%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk PAS vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
372,185 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email