Compare CyberArk PAS vs. Idaptive

CyberArk PAS is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management with 28 reviews while Idaptive is ranked 9th in Access Management with 1 review. CyberArk PAS is rated 9.0, while Idaptive is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk PAS writes "Provides simplicity and ease of implementation for the right level of security controls". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Idaptive writes "A stable solution for accessing on-premises active directory". CyberArk PAS is most compared with BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Thycotic Secret Server, SailPoint IdentityIQ and Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, whereas Idaptive is most compared with Okta Workforce Identity, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Azure Active Directory Premium, Jamf Pro and SailPoint IdentityNow.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
CyberArk PAS Logo
37,125 views|17,626 comparisons
Idaptive Logo
1,132 views|792 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Anonymous User
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The risk of lost password and forbidden access to resources has been drastically reduced which increased the security level for the entire company,CyberArk has been easy for us to implement and the adoption has been good. We've been able to standardize a bunch of things. We've been able to standardize relatively easily with the use of the platforms and managing the policies.CyberArk is a very stable product and it's a stable product because it has a simple design and a simple architecture that allows you to leverage the economies of scale across the base of your infrastructure that you already have implemented. It doesn't really introduce any new complex pieces of infrastructure that would make it that much more difficult to scale.When we started with RPA, there was a requirement that every credential and the bots themselves be protected through the PAM system. From the get-go, we've had CyberArk in the middle... We've got a pretty robust RPA implementation with our PAM platform. Users, bots, the credentials — everything is managed via our PAM solution.Right off the bat, the most valuable feature is the DNA scan. It gives us the ability to scan our environment and find the accounts that we're going to need to take under control.The Password Upload Utility tool makes it easier when setting up a Safe that contains multiple accounts and has cut down the amount of time that it takes to complete the task.For a while, there were individual IDs having privileged access. We wanted to restrict that. We implemented the solution so that it can be more of internal control. We can have session recordings happening and reduce our attacks.There are no issues with scalability. Our clients are very happy to use the product.

More CyberArk PAS Pros »

The feature that we find most valuable is the ability to integrate multiple IDs for on-premises Active Directory.

More Idaptive Pros »

Cons
It needs better documentation with more examples for the configuration files and API/REST integrationThere is a bit of a learning curve, but it's a pretty complex solution.CyberArk has to continue to evolve with that threat landscape to make sure that they're still protecting those credentials that are owned by those that have privileged accounts in the firms.The one place where we found that this product really needs to improve is the cloud. Simple integrations don't exist, even today. We don't have anything specific on CyberArk for managing, SaaS products, SaaS vendors, SaaS credentials. I understand it's a vendor-based thing and that they have to coordinate with the other vendors to be able to do that, and there are integrations coming. But these are the major places where CyberArk definitely needs to invest some more time.It's a big program. To scale excessively, locally, on an on-prem application, takes a lot of servers.Currently, in Secure Connect, an end user is required to enter account information manually, and cannot save any of this information for future use.Integration with the ticketing system should allow any number of fields to be used for validation before allowing a user to be evaluated and able to access a server.The initial setup of CyberArk is a challenge if you do not have prior experience with it.

More CyberArk PAS Cons »

We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices.

More Idaptive Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
In comparison to other products on the market, CyberArk is a more costly product.This solution is considered to be more expensive than others out there on the market today.I do not have any opinions to add about the pricing of the product.No, I do not have any advice on the price of the product.Network and security licenses are currently being managed by other outsource vendors, so they are facing some type of problems in the digital aspect.

More CyberArk PAS Pricing and Cost Advice »

We find that the pricing and licensing of this solution is adequate, as compared to the other competitors in the market.

More Idaptive Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Access Management solutions are best for your needs.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
37,125
Comparisons
17,626
Reviews
26
Average Words per Review
496
Avg. Rating
9.1
9th
out of 30 in Access Management
Views
1,132
Comparisons
792
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
355
Avg. Rating
8.0
Popular Comparisons
Compared 29% of the time.
Compared 23% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Also Known As
CyberArk Privileged Access Security, CyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerCentrify Application Services
Learn
CyberArk
CyberArk
Video Not Available
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

Idaptive delivers Next-Gen Access, protecting organizations through a zero trust approach. With Idaptive, organizations secure access everywhere, reduce complexity and have newfound confidence to adopt modern business models and deliver awesome customer experiences.

Offer
Learn more about CyberArk PAS
Learn more about Idaptive
Sample Customers
Rockwell AutomationMLB, Citi, Pfizer, SulAmerica, GE Capital, Shiseido
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm28%
Insurance Company14%
Energy/Utilities Company10%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm6%
Media Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Real Estate/Law Firm13%
Media Company9%
Government7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business17%
Midsize Enterprise10%
Large Enterprise73%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise5%
Large Enterprise81%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Okta, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Access Management. Updated: July 2020.
430,905 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Access Management vendors.

We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.