We performed a comparison between CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM)."The most valuable feature is Special Monitoring."
"It is a robust product."
"The technical support is good."
"CyberArk has helped us to identify, store, protect, and monitor the usage of privileged accounts."
"You can write different types of policies for custom business needs or any developer needs. If they need certain functions allocated, they can be customized easily."
"Helped us meet our standards and requirements to help us comply with industry standards and banking regulations."
"I really like the PTA (Privileged Threat Analytics). I find this the best feature."
"Technical support has been very responsive in navigating challenges. It is very easy to open a ticket."
"I appreciate its ability to provide multi-factor authentication, but it's primarily focused on this function."
"It integrates very tightly with the rest of the Fortinet ecosystem."
"FortiAuthenticator is really good software that integrates very well with Fortinet products."
"We have a perpetual license for 2FA."
"It reduces the need for network administrator intervention by allowing the user to perform their own registration and resolve their own password problems and issues."
"The implementation has significantly improved access management within our organization."
"The product’s most valuable feature is integration with FortiGate, FortiToken, FortiTalk, and multi-factor authentication."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is an easy-to-use solution."
"The initial setup has room for improvement to be more straightforward."
"Online help needs to be looked into with live agent support."
"The authentication port is available in CyberArk Alero but not Fortinet products."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager difficulty depends on the environment that you are implementing it into. However, it typically is simple."
"The web interface has come a long way, but the PrivateArk client seems clunky and not intuitive. It could use an update to be brought up to speed with the usability of PVWA."
"There is a learning curve when it comes to planning out the deployment strategy, but once it is defined, it runs itself."
"it manages creds based on Organizational Units. That is, a "safe" is limited to specific OUs. That makes for very elaborate OU structure, or you risk exposing too many devices by putting most of them in fewer OUs."
"Areas the product could be improved are in some of the reporting capabilities and how the reports are configured."
"There is room for improvement in stability and support."
"There is a room for improvement. The log is a bit difficult to access, and searching the log codes is also a bit difficult. So it would be much better if, when we open a log, it could provide detailed information about errors, reasons for failure, and such."
"The only way the solution could be improved is if it were cheaper."
"The solution could be more automated. It should be able to let me automate a lot of things so that what normally is done as a matter of manual processes can be handled quicker. Slow integrations can be taken up/out if there was more automation."
"FortiAuthenticator's interface could be better."
"Fortinet FortiAuthenticator's initial setup process could be easier."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"The technical support team is bad."
More CyberArk Privileged Access Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is ranked 1st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 142 reviews while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 5th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is rated 8.8, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Manager writes "Lets you ensure relevant, compliant access in good time and with an audit trail, yet lacks clarity on MITRE ATT&CK". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". CyberArk Privileged Access Manager is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Microsoft Entra ID, Delinea Secret Server, WALLIX Bastion and ARCON Privileged Access Management, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Yubico YubiKey.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.