We performed a comparison between CylancePROTECT and Panda Adaptive Defense 360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"It is stable and scalable."
"We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"The features that I have found most valuable are the ability to customize it and to reduce its size. It lets you run in a very small window in terms of memory and resources on legacy cash registers."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's firewalling, rule creation, monitoring, and inspection profiles are great."
"The Application Guard and ByteGuard are useful features."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"I like the AI and mathematical components that they use."
"The solution is very quick at easily changing the levels of protection for each computer and the server."
"The most functional item that we use is the process to turn off the false flags that it causes."
"The most valuable features are script blocking and macros within Word documents for stopping unwanted applications from running in the background."
"CylancePROTECT works on AI technology, is always up to date, and uses very few resources on your devices."
"Centralized dashboard online which can be used for managing a huge product."
"Adaptive Defense is pretty easy to use, and Panda support is excellent."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its device control."
"Their remote management (RMM) is very good."
"We have control over our devices, specifically USB ports, allowing us to block or control the traffic."
"The protection from malware is the most important feature. It has some endpoint information about the vehicle of the virus, malware, etc. It is also stable and easy to install, and they also provide good technical support."
"I like the Panda Security Adaptive Defense cloud usages. Everything is on a single plane of glass like the dashboards. I also like the information I can get about the computers itself."
"It allows us to stop activation windows."
"The feature I find most valuable is the advance search engine."
"There's room for improvement in the quick response time and technical support for integration issues, especially when dealing with multiple vendors."
"The solution's installation from a central installation server could be improved because the engineers had a little bit of trouble getting it installed from a central location."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The solution is not stable."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."
"The price for this EPP platform is expensive and could be improved."
"We would like to see secure integration and multi-factor authentication to be able to access the administration dashboard."
"While you are working, you are finding these things that were supposed to be waived have come back to being blocked. That's frustrating."
"The management console needs a little maturity in how it presents data and allows the administrator to drill down or search across systems."
"They could improve on the false positives, reporting and whitelisting features."
"Having worked with SentinelOne, Cylance is good, however, it probably needs to add a feature similar to SentinelOne's rollback functionality. With this feature, if you get infected, with a click, you can go back to the pre-infection state. If Cylance could add this functionality to their offering as well, that would be ideal."
"The solution’s user interface could be improved."
"I'd like to integrate it into my main services."
"They need to offer a clear dashboard so you can see everything everywhere all at once."
"Needs a better way to scan the hardware to detect whether it's valid."
"The only part I really don't use as much is their firewall. It's a bit superfluous. Most people have their own firewall in place, so they don't really need that part portion of the solution."
"I would like to see better data protection."
"It would be nice if Panda Security Adaptive Defense could come out with remote desktop usage."
"It needs some improvements in the DNS security feature. Currently, it does not have full DNS security. It only has semi-DNS security, which can be improved. It is an important feature for us, and it would be really good if they can improve the DNS security feature. Our group has some plans to change to Cisco AMP, which has features such as DNS, Umbrella. We are trying to learn about Cisco AMP and compare it with Panda."
"For some urgent updates, I don't like the need for the tool to be frequently restarted."
CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 25 reviews. CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0, while Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Panda Adaptive Defense 360 writes "Managing multiple machines is a pain, but support is top notch". CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security, whereas Panda Adaptive Defense 360 is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Malwarebytes. See our CylancePROTECT vs. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.