We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and ETL Solutions Transformation Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Low-code development is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"It has been a stable product."
"The iPaaS functionality is very mature. The browser based IDE is also very mature and stable."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"It is a reliable solution."
"Back in the day, we could only get reports and analyze what happened after the fact, but today now we can generate real-time insights. Transformation Manager feeds your data science projects. We generate models and then give them to the clients, so they can come up with real-time predictions and recommendations in addition to reporting."
"It is among the best, even if not widely known."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"Documentation could be improved."
"We would like to see more involvement between Dell Boomi and the end-users to help improve the customer experience."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"There is room for improvement in the solution's visualization tool."
"They should build a functional architecture based on queuing."
"Transformation Manager reporting could be better. There are better options for reporting tools these days. We use Microsoft BI sometimes, but Tableau is becoming too expensive. Microsoft BI's visualization features are maturing."
More ETL Solutions Transformation Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is ranked 32nd in Data Integration with 3 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ETL Solutions Transformation Manager writes "It lets us create models so we can generate real-time predictions and insights for a our clients". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas ETL Solutions Transformation Manager is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, Axway AMPLIFY Application Integration, TIBCO Spotfire, Altair Monarch and Denodo. See our Boomi AtomSphere Integration vs. ETL Solutions Transformation Manager report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
