We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Integration and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Microsoft, Oracle and others in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)."AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"I like the tool's optimization feature."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"The solution has a lot of connectors, which is quite helpful."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"Integrity, ease of use, user-friendly user interface, and errorless logs are the most valuable features."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"There should be more scripting possibilities."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"In the past few months, there have been some server downtimes during work hours that have affected some critical scheduled integrations."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."
Boomi AtomSphere Integration is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 13th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 13 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Integration is rated 7.8, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Integration writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". Boomi AtomSphere Integration is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SSIS and Azure Data Factory, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Hi,
If you are looking for a cost-effective solution you should look to the Google Cloud Platform. It offers a lot of possibilities and you only pay processing time.
We are using this platform to integrate data from SAP and other systems and are still discovering the possibilities of the platform. After 3 months of intensive development and testing with 4-5 people, the cost is not exceeding 250 Euro. Our knowledge when we started was nihil.
I don't thank you'll find a better engineered, well though out, and higher performing platform than Boomi. In conjunction with Boomi flow (formerly ManyWho) for BPM, Boomi can handle all of your integration needs. Probably the slickest offering on the market.
You have to clearly look at integration/data exchange patterns for real-time/ near real-time / batch between ERP and your client systems. An integration reference architecture identifying integration points is key. The tools highlighted don't sound they may check the box on everything. Key is rationalizing your patterns with the right fit for purpose stack
and conduct a few use case-based technology validations. I would say pick a client/clients for a pilot as well and keep evolving.
If you have a budget constraint, limit your validations to pilot clients, but use the reference architecture to guide integrations and validations.
I would suggest a lean DevOps with a CI/CD (Continuous integration/ Continuous delivery) construct to keep constantly delivering outcomes preferably with cloud. Only a cloud will give you the flexibility to start small and expand as you need.
This is the best answer I can give you given your situation. For more details, call me to discuss.
We are currently on-prem on Oracle ERP 11i and planning to migrate to Cloud Version. I have been looking at the middleware tools and finally want to go with Oracle PaaS technology with the Oracle Integration Cloud Services. I am not sure if Dell Boomi and Cast Iron could be leveraged to build complex integrations with the flexibility and scalability in mind. We have very many third-party integrations and wanted to embrace much reliable middleware that could be scalable in point of time. I wish to add, MFT services, API management, AI and ML to the existing as we move forward.
You could try SOACS or Apiary from Oracle. The licensing prices are available and can be checked into.
I would add SnapLogic into that mix but the three he listed along with SnapLogic are the top modern iPaaS platforms currently. Not sure what direction Salesforce will take Mulesoft.
SnapLogic is more of an enterprise scale solution and may be too expensive. I currently building the platform he references for my firm using an ecosystem approach as this area is complex and no one technology can cover all of it. We are focused on a microservices approach to delivering specific capabilities in each of the areas referenced below.
As considering the definitive cost factor, the only ESB (that I would use in that cost level) that has equal licensing costs comes from JBoss (or RedHat, if the commercial support is needed).
I have had now few projects where the RH’s Fuse has been used and it has been adequate to all customer requirements.
Personally, I have not any experience of the Jitterbit Harmony, so that also could solve your needs.
I’m not sure that would the Mule standard version fulfill all your needs, as usually, you have soon to get it’s Enterprise version to solve your needs/regs. But, otherwise, the Mule is very powerful also.
To my knowledge, the Mule Enterprise and Dell Boom do have a much higher price tag.
Thanks,
Art
IBM APP connect provides an integration hub for complex integrations inside
enterprise.
It offers cloud solution as well and is suitable to be the glue application
for no matter on-premise or cloud applications.
If a client needs to expose their API to external partners, I would like to
suggest another IBM product named APIC which is an API gateway similar to
Mulesoft AnyPoint listed below.
I would recommend to use Mulesoft AnyPoint and Runtime for your scenarios mentioned below
And also explore & follow API-Led Connectivity integration architecture, design & implementation approach during API Lifecycle (that can scale & reusable) and wish you also look into examples in MuleSoft Exchange to speed up the development process.
Search in MuleSoft Exchange for “Catalyst Accelerator for Retail” to look into reference API-led Connectivity implementation templates & RAML Specs.
From Cost perspective, please reach out to MuleSoft Sales team for negotiated prices.
Thanks!
Bharath