We performed a comparison between GWAVA [EOL] and Imperva Bot Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Veritas, Barracuda Networks and others in Email Archiving."It's a perfect business pump filter. We have much less false positives, and also less spam than other organizations."
"I am impressed with the product's automatic bot mechanism. It also gives us the control to create our own custom bot rules."
"The stability of the product is good since I haven't had any problems with the solution."
"The solution needs to be more user-friendly. I don't want to have to go to my IT guy and have him explain aspects of the solution to me. There should be a way for them to be able to translate aspects of the product to a typical user in a clear concise way."
"Sometimes, it takes a bit of time for the technical staff of the solution to get back to our company with a resolution for our problems."
"The tool needs to include artificial intelligence and machine learning. It also needs to improve profiling."
Earn 20 points
GWAVA [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Email Archiving while Imperva Bot Management is ranked 4th in Bot Management with 2 reviews. GWAVA [EOL] is rated 9.0, while Imperva Bot Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of GWAVA [EOL] writes "An excellent anti-spam solution for mail systems". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Imperva Bot Management writes "A product that offers advanced bot detection capabilities and reporting features". GWAVA [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Imperva Bot Management is most compared with Cloudflare, Cequence Security, AWS WAF, Akamai Bot Manager and DataDome Real-Time Bot Protection.
We monitor all Email Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
