We performed a comparison between Infor LN and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"I would say that it is typically used by large-scale manufacturing industries, especially in discrete manufacturing, and it has proven to work brilliantly."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"It's fast, predicts well, and is basically the best tool in the market for the automotive industry and network planning projects."
"It has strong sales, purchase, warehousing, and logistics order management."
"The initial setup is easy."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"I like the tool’s multisite functionality."
"It is easy to inquire about any account in our company."
"The solution is stable."
"I have found the solutions best features to be financial procurement, inventory, and manufacturing."
"We did not have any problems with the scalability of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne."
"The most valuable features of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne are the flexibility of the configuration, it is highly configurable. It is not rigid as other solutions, such as SAP. They have recently added a custom workflow approach and approval workflows."
"Traceability is the most valuable feature of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne...The stability of the solution is excellent."
"The financials are great."
"We find the ease of use, customization, and user interface valuable."
"From a technical perspective, LN needs to work on customization and integration. It's fairly expensive for many clients to migrate from a customized private solution to the cloud. Infor needs to improve the cloud solution to make the migration from the on-prem customized solution faster and smoother. Otherwise, many clients will find it difficult or expensive to do."
"It's not that intuitive."
"I would like to see the CRM improved. I would also like to see a supply chain management feature."
"In general, the HR-related part of Infor LN doesn't work properly in Germany, making it an area that requires improvement."
"When you have a bug in the system, you get some kind of alert. They should explain those alerts more."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The training for Infor LN is not straightforward, so a non-specialist will need training before using it."
"Treasury management is typically used in forex, loans, trade management and property management is not available. The solution could improve if they added them."
"The solution could be easier to implement. However, the complexity was in our internal processes meeting our country's requirements. Every country has a slightly different process, taxation, and rules. That was the difficult part, not the solution itself. I expect our experience would have been more or less the same with any ERP, such as SAP, Navision, or Dynamics."
"The solution could improve by having additional efficient analytics available to more users. They should allow a sample database to be able to test and do proof of concept would be extremely valuable to all of our clients."
"JD Edwards EnterpriseOne could improve the speed because sometimes it takes time to load into the environment. This is typical when the ESU patch packages are used."
"They need to improve the logs and need to write some sort of script that clears logs after so many days."
"The only issue with the solution that it yet to consider improvements in its price."
"The initial setup was complex...One should get the end-user manual because, in some parts, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is not user-friendly."
"Forms customization should be easier. Currently, it has to go through the development life cycle."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is ranked 7th in ERP with 55 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne writes "Simplifies processes, is easy to set up, and offers good integrations". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and Anaplan, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne is most compared with JD Edwards World, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, SAP ERP, Oracle E-Business Suite and Infor M3. See our Infor LN vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.