We performed a comparison between Infor LN and QAD Cloud ERP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The project module is the best that I've ever seen, and more than that, it's the company's flexibility to change. It means that in our company, Infor LN has the capability to support many kinds of industries."
"Our clients appreciate the financial part of the solution, which is usually very complex. The Spanish localization is also very good."
"The most valuable feature is its ability to handle products with up to 2,500 components, making it valuable for streamlining complex business operations."
"The best feature of this solution, is that it provides businesses with a way to see information from across different process streams, in one place via dashboards."
"The best feature of this solution is it comes as a complete bundle. The solution has effective project, document, and application management. Additionally, the collaboration is fantastic, it is well integrated, and can be customized."
"The best thing about Infor LN is that you can use it for inter-company business and for international businesses, especially by mid-sized and big companies."
"We have definitely seen a return on our investment with the product."
"Infor LN has basically the same structure as CloudSuite Industrial, but LN has more advanced planning tools for manufacturing."
"It is the most stable solution that I've ever worked with."
"The solution serves its purpose and does what we need it to do."
"One area that could be improved in Omada Access Points is team communication."
"The user interface needs to be improved."
"The tool is expensive. It needs to refine its planning details."
"Infor LN has customer support in India, but service could be improved. So, basically, they prioritize agreements, and the number of tickets closed within a certain timeframe, not necessarily the quality or resolution of the tickets themselves. They just open and close them, sometimes without even understanding the issue. That's the biggest problem."
"When it comes to planning, it's more challenging to consider the entire structure, such as having a specific SKU and wanting to look at the planning for the whole structure. You must delve into individual item details to plan for it with order planning. Therefore, improvements will allow more comprehensive planning for each SKU."
"Regarding areas for improvement within the solution, I would say that the solution's asset management and quality management need attention."
"It's not that intuitive."
"From a customers' perspective, Infor LN covers most of the processes in the company, but sometimes, they have to choose other tools because of the functionality or the cost of the Infor solution. It covers the core functions of the company—such as financial, operations, logistics, and so on—very well, but it doesn't cover some parts such as invoices, digitization, etc."
"The product lacks a lot of features and technology."
"Just implementing an ERP system takes a lot of time."
Infor LN is ranked 8th in ERP with 24 reviews while QAD Cloud ERP is ranked 24th in ERP with 2 reviews. Infor LN is rated 8.2, while QAD Cloud ERP is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Infor LN writes "A flexible ERP with the best project module and excellent support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of QAD Cloud ERP writes "The product lacks a lot of features and technology, though it is the most stable solution in the market". Infor LN is most compared with SAP ERP, Infor M3, Infor LX, Infor CloudSuite Industrial and SAP S/4HANA, whereas QAD Cloud ERP is most compared with IFS Cloud Platform, SAP ERP, SAP S/4HANA, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and NetSuite ERP. See our Infor LN vs. QAD Cloud ERP report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.