Most Helpful Review
Strong IDS solution, easy deployment, coverage across multiple platforms with at-a-glance dashboard and many more...
Use RSA NetWitness Endpoint? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about ESET Endpoint Security vs. RSA NetWitness Endpoint and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
454,950 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers."
"I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help."
"For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE."
"The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things."
"The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now."
"I am really satisfied with the technical support."
"It is a very stable program."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the management."
"The most valuable feature is the antispam module, which comes in the bundle."
"Technical support has been very good. They're quick to respond to any problems."
"The most valuable features are the sandbox, mail scanning, sandboxing attachments, files, and that it responds to VPN porting."
"This is a product at the top of its game. That is the reason we choose to support and sell it."
"The potential threat protection feature is the most valuable. In the event that one of my computers is not on the network and gets a virus, ESET Endpoint Security quickly detects the malware, and in most cases, it removes the virus. It also has the ability to remotely shut down the computer. I like the remote control part the most."
"The protection and device control features are the most valuable. I found its user interface and integration pretty good. It is very user friendly as compared to other products."
"I would say that this solution has the best support team in this kind of Endpoint protection product."
"It is stable. We have been using it for some time, without any issues."
"We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our issues."
"This solution allows us to locate the malware in real-time."
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released."
"I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails."
"The solution needs more in-depth analytics."
"In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication."
"The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device."
"In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened."
"The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved."
"I would like more seamless integration."
"Everything has some kind of room for improvement."
"If I were in an environment that required a large-scale deployment then I would choose another solution over ESET."
"The solution should offer more security surrounding blacklisted websites."
"The solution includes only Intrusion Detection and not IPS, which is an important feature that is missing in my version."
"The product could have better integration with third-party products that would help extend functionality."
"They could be more aggressive with malware."
"A few times, we have had problems with downloading an agent. We had to try multiple times and multiple uploads."
"This solution needs an upgrade in reporting. I have heard from RSA that they are working on this, but as of yet it is not available."
"The contamination feature could be improved."
"I would like to see Security Orchestration and Response Automation (SOAR) integration."
Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360."
"The price is very good."
"The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost."
"Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc."
"In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement."
"Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection."
"There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization."
"The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."
"This solution is a good value for the money."
"Currently, we are running on a three-year license. The pricing might be around $20,000. There aren't any costs above the standard licensing fee."
"It is subjective. I don't think it is expensive. If you can have 10 user licenses for less than $100, I don't think it is expensive."
"Its price is fair. If we compare it with any other retail product, it is a little harder to compete with."
"I do not have any opinion on the pricing or licensing of the product."
"The cost depends on the number of endpoints that you want to monitor, but it is not expensive."
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Top Answer: We've contacted technical support several times. They've been very good. They have been able to help us resolve our… more »
Top Answer: The contamination feature could be improved.
Top Answer: We use the solution for the contamination. We detect the incidents and then proceed for the contamination and error… more »
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 30% of the time.
Compared 14% of the time.
Compared 8% of the time.
Compared 7% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 18% of the time.
Compared 13% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Compared 10% of the time.
Also Known As
|Smart Security||RSA ECAT|
Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.
Comprehensive multilayered security, combining machine learning and human expertise. Enables organizations to:
Protect against Ransomware
|RSA NetWitness Endpoint is an endpoint detection and response solution that employs a combination of live memory analysis, continuous behavioral monitoring, and advanced machine learning to detect known, new, unknown, and non-malware threats that other solutions miss entirely. RSA NetWitness Endpoint helps focus investigations amid thousands of alerts and offers 3X the impact for security teams by considerably reducing attacker dwelltime and accelerating threat response.|
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about ESET Endpoint Security
Learn more about RSA NetWitness Endpoint
|Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial Bank||ERSTE Group Bank, Miller Solutions, Wesleyan University, The Hospital Center of Luxembourg, Deer Valley USD, SPAR, Industrial Federal Credit Union, Honda, City Hall of Palmela, Hays CISD, Lester B Pearson School Board||ADP, Ameritas, Partners Healthcare|
Comms Service Provider7%
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company23%
Financial Services Firm4%
Comms Service Provider14%
Non Tech Company14%
Comms Service Provider35%
Computer Software Company21%
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm6%
ESET Endpoint Security is ranked 19th in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 8 reviews while RSA NetWitness Endpoint is ranked 33rd in Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business with 3 reviews. ESET Endpoint Security is rated 7.6, while RSA NetWitness Endpoint is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ESET Endpoint Security writes "Good spam protection and integration, but the deployment process needs to be improved". On the other hand, the top reviewer of RSA NetWitness Endpoint writes "Good performance and reporting, and can discover unknown malware using signatureless detection methods". ESET Endpoint Security is most compared with Microsoft Defender Antivirus, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security, Kaspersky Endpoint Security, SentinelOne and Bitdefender GravityZone Ultra, whereas RSA NetWitness Endpoint is most compared with Carbon Black CB Defense, CrowdStrike Falcon, Symantec End-user Endpoint Security and Darktrace. See our ESET Endpoint Security vs. RSA NetWitness Endpoint report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection (EPP) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.