Compare ESET Enterprise Inspector vs. SECDO Platform

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use SECDO Platform? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Cisco and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Its most valuable features are its scalability and advanced threat protection for customers.""I am told that we get over 100 million emails a month. This filters them down and allows only somewhere about three million emails, which is a great help.""For the initial first level of support, we provide it from our side. If there's escalation required, we use Cisco tech for the AMP. And again, they are perfect. I mean, one of the best, compared to any other vendors.""The most valuable features of this solution are the IPS and the integration with ISE.""The simplicity of use is its most valuable feature. You can very clearly see things.""The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now.""I am really satisfied with the technical support.""It is a very stable program."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pros »

"I find the multilayered endpoint security the most valuable feature."

More ESET Enterprise Inspector Pros »

"The ease of deployment is a valuable feature."

More SECDO Platform Pros »

Cons
"We would like to have an API integration with a SIEM solution, because as far as I know, it currently hasn't yet been released.""I would like them to add whatever makes filtering more advanced in scanning and blocking for malware in emails.""The solution needs more in-depth analytics.""In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication.""The initial setup is a bit complex because you need to execute existing antiviruses or security software that you have on your device.""In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened.""The reporting and analytics areas of the solution need to be improved.""I would like more seamless integration."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Cons »

"It is not a stable product. We were disappointed in the stability of this product in comparison to McAffee."

More ESET Enterprise Inspector Cons »

"The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market."

More SECDO Platform Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The costs of 50 licenses of AMP for three years is around $9,360.""The price is very good.""The visibility that we have into the endpoint and the forensics that we're able to collect give us value for the price. This is not an overly expensive solution, considering all the things that are provided. You get great performance and value for the cost.""Whenever you are doing the licensing process, I would highly advise to look at what other Cisco solutions you have in your organization, then evaluate if an Enterprise Agreement is the best way to go. In our case, it was the best way to go. Since we had so many other Cisco products, we were able to tie those in. We were actually able to get several Cisco security solutions for less than if we had bought three or four Cisco security solutions independently or ad hoc.""In our case, it is a straightforward annual payment through our Enterprise Agreement.""Our company was very happy with the price of Cisco AMP. It was about a third of what we were paying for System Center Endpoint Protection.""There are a couple of different consumption models: Pay up front, or if you have an enterprise agreement, you can do a monthly thing. Check your licensing possibilities and see what's best for your organization.""The Enterprise Agreement is like an all-you-can-eat buffet of Cisco products. In that vein, it was very affordable."

More Cisco AMP for Endpoints Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The pricing and licensing are the big issue now, in my opinion. If the price was less than other companies, or a one-time charge for service was available, I think there would be more users of this solution."

More ESET Enterprise Inspector Pricing and Cost Advice »

"The price of this solution is the highest in the market, although there are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

More SECDO Platform Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The solution's integration capabilities are excellent. It's one of the best features.
Top Answer: Nice to have URL management, password protection of the app, more details of the machine & user running the app.
Top Answer: The primary use case is for endpoint protection. For the larger deployments, we use it for our policy enforcement as… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The ease of deployment is a valuable feature.
Top Answer: The price of this solution is the highest in the market, although there are no costs in addition to the standard… more »
Top Answer: The price should be reduced in order to be more competitive in the market.
Popular Comparisons
Compared 17% of the time.
Compared 11% of the time.
Learn
Cisco
ESET
Palo Alto Networks
Overview

Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) is subscription-based, managed through a web-based management console, and deployed on a variety of platforms that protects endpoints, network, email and web Traffic. AMP key features include the following: Global threat intelligence to proactively defend against known and emerging threats, Advanced sandboxing that performs automated static and dynamic analysis of files against more than 700 behavioral indicators, Point-in-time malware detection and blocking in real time and Continuous analysis and retrospective security regardless of the file's disposition and Continuous analysis and retrospective security.

ESET Enterprise Inspector is a sophisticated EDR tool for identification of anomalous behavior and breaches, risk assessment, incident response, investigations and remediation. It monitors and evaluates all the activities happening in the network (for example, user, file, process, registry, memory and network events) in real time and allows you to take immediate action if needed.

SECDO enables security teams to identify and remediate incidents fast. Using thread-level endpoint monitoring and causality analytics, SECDO provides visibility into every endpoint along with the context necessary for understanding whether a suspicious activity is a genuine threat. Unique deception techniques force threats like ransomware out into the open early, and trigger automated containment and remediation.

SECDO provides the most intuitive investigation experience available so you can quickly unravel complex incidents across the organization.  You can investigate incidents detected by SECDO as well as alerts from the SIEM. SECDO visualizes the attack chain so you immediately understand the “who, what, where, when and how” behind the incident. Then, based on an analysis of exactly how endpoints were compromised, SECDO surgically remediates the incident with minimum user impact.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco AMP for Endpoints
Learn more about ESET Enterprise Inspector
Learn more about SECDO Platform
Sample Customers
Heritage Bank, Mobile County Schools, NHL University, Thunder Bay Regional, Yokogawa Electric, Sam Houston State University, First Financial BankMitsubishi Motors, Allianz Suisse, Cannon, T-MobileValley National Bank, IDT Corporation
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Healthcare Company20%
Government13%
University7%
Comms Service Provider7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Government5%
Financial Services Firm3%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company43%
Comms Service Provider19%
Media Company13%
Government9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise58%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Cisco and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR). Updated: November 2020.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
ESET Enterprise Inspector is ranked 13th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review while SECDO Platform is ranked 15th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 1 review. ESET Enterprise Inspector is rated 10.0, while SECDO Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of ESET Enterprise Inspector writes "Allows for storage of sensitive data and prevents leaks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SECDO Platform writes "Mature threat detection, easy to manage with a good dashboard, and the educational portal is helpful". ESET Enterprise Inspector is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response, whereas SECDO Platform is most compared with Palo Alto Network Cortex XSOAR, Fortinet FortiSOAR, IBM Resilient, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and ServiceNow Security Operations.

See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.