We performed a comparison between F5 Advanced WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Provides good protection from attacks."
"It's a fairly easy-to-use and user-friendly tool. My administrators and team also like its ability to customize the rules per the requirements."
"The solution uses AI to protect against botnet attacks."
"F5 Advanced WAF is a stable solution, we are satisfied. It is more stable than ForiWeb."
"F5 Advanced WAF has very good stability and scalability. Its initial setup was straightforward."
"F5 Advanced WAF helps our engineers to learn the complete configuration, including fundamental and advanced policies."
"It can scale."
"This solution is an enterprise-class firewall that provides both load-balancing and security."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"Most customers encounter stability issues with the product's Big-IP logs."
"The user interface (UI) seems a bit outdated. Making it more user-friendly would be beneficial."
"The solution could improve by having an independent capture module. It has a built feature that you can deploy the capture on your published website. However, it's not very user-friendly. When you compare this feature to Google Capture or other enterprise captures, they are very simple. It needs a good connection to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. When you implement this feature in the data center, you may suffer some complications with connecting to the F5 Advanced WAF sandbox. This should be improved in the future."
"The solution's dashboard could be improved. When you're moving from policy to policy, the logs and the integration of the logs in other systems aren't straightforward."
"The solution should include RASP for another level of protection at the code itself."
"The solution is tedious. It takes a lot of discrete settings so one needs to get detailed and granular when they use the solution. It takes you a whole lot of energy and concentration to configure. It needs to be much more straight-forward, like other web solutions."
"I would like to see a better interface and better documentation compatibility with other products. It's more complicated with OWASP."
"I would like to see the API Protection improved."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
F5 Advanced WAF is ranked 2nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 55 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. F5 Advanced WAF is rated 8.6, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of F5 Advanced WAF writes "Flexible configuration, reliable, and highly professional support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". F5 Advanced WAF is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, AWS WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Radware DefensePro and AWS WAF.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
