We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Indusface AppTrana based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft, F5 and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"The most valuable feature is the capability to limit access based on geographical location by restricting specific IP addresses."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"The stability of AWS WAF is valuable."
"We preferred the product based on its cost. AWS WAF is an out-of-the-box solution and integrates with the AWS services that we use. It's natively integrated with AWS."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"The customized billing is the most valuable feature."
"AWS WAF is a stable solution. The performance of the solution is very good."
"We use Indusface AppTrana as a firewall."
"One area for improvement in AWS WAF could be the limitation on the number of rules, particularly those from third-party sources, within the free tier."
"The solution is cloud-based, and therefore the billing model that comes with it could be more intuitive, in my opinion. It's very easy to not fully understand how you tag things for billing and then you can quite easily run up a high bill without realizing it. The solution needs to be more intuitive around the tagging system, which enables the billing. Right now, I have a cloud architect that does that on our behalf and it isn't something that a business user could use because it still requires quite a lot of technical knowledge to do effectively."
"While the complexity of the installation can vary from one service to another, overall, I would say that it and the configuration and navigation are somewhat complex."
"We need more support as we go global."
"An improvement area would be that it's more of a manual effort when you have to enable rules. That's one of the downsides. If that can be done in an automated way, it would be great. That's a lagging feature currently."
"They should work to define more threats, add more security, and make it more compliant with more security companies."
"We have issues with reporting, troubleshooting, and analytics. AWS WAF needs to bring costs down."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"The solution should add an enhanced dashboard to make it easy to navigate."
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Indusface AppTrana is ranked 26th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 1 review. AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Indusface AppTrana is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Indusface AppTrana writes "Cost-effective and used as an effective firewall". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, F5 Advanced WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, whereas Indusface AppTrana is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall, Akamai App and API Protector and Radware DefensePro.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.