Compare Fabasoft app.test vs. Zeenyx AscentialTest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Fabasoft app.test? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"Once it starts generating ROI, which for us took between three and six months, one will not even think about the investment."

More Zeenyx AscentialTest Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
41st
Views
71
Comparisons
53
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
7th
Views
2,028
Comparisons
469
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
584
Avg. Rating
9.6
Popular Comparisons
Compared 53% of the time.
Also Known As
AscentialTest
Learn
Fabasoft
Zeenyx
Video Not Available
Overview

Fabasoft app.test is the tool for functional software test automation in the Fabasoft product realm. Fabasoft app.test focuses on the automation of tests in a way that simulates how a real user would interact with the applications, i.e. by driving the user interface in the web browser.

AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
Offer
Learn more about Fabasoft app.test
Learn more about Zeenyx AscentialTest
Sample Customers
Envisage Information Systems, Computer Sciences Consulting, Österreichische Post AGTJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company34%
Construction Company13%
Healthcare Company12%
Retailer10%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business36%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise36%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Worksoft, Micro Focus and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: October 2020.
442,194 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fabasoft app.test is ranked 41st in Functional Testing Tools while Zeenyx AscentialTest is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. Fabasoft app.test is rated 0.0, while Zeenyx AscentialTest is rated 9.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "Our university students who enter our tests have found it easy to master with minimal assistance, but classes could be more object-oriented". Fabasoft app.test is most compared with , whereas Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with Selenium HQ, SmartBear TestComplete, Katalon Studio and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.