Selenium HQ vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

Selenium HQ is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 13 reviews vs Zeenyx AscentialTest which is ranked 12th in Functional Testing Tools with 5 reviews. The top reviewer of Selenium HQ writes "Provides Freedom To Choose The Tools Needed For Full-Fledged Automation Framework". The top reviewer of Zeenyx AscentialTest writes "You can build tests using drag and drop. AUT is not required". Selenium HQ is most compared with Tricentis Tosca, UFT Pro (LeanFT) and SmartBear TestComplete. Zeenyx AscentialTest is most compared with SmartBear TestComplete, UFT (QTP) and Visual Studio Test Professional. See our Selenium HQ vs Zeenyx AscentialTest report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs Zeenyx AscentialTest and others in Functional Testing Tools.
290,996 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Selenium HQ vs Zeenyx AscentialTest

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The primary benefit is its cost and the ability to use the cloud.Our platform runs into several thousand screens and a few thousand test cases, something which would typically take months to test manually. As of today, the entire process takes a little over two days to run.Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.It is programming language agnostic, you can write tests in most currently used languages.It has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only.It supports most of the mainstream browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE and etc.Selenium web driver - Java.Language support - since it supports Java and other programming languages it is easy to integrate with other systems.

Read more »

The most valuable feature of AscentialTest for us is that it fully supports PowerBuilder.

Read more »

Cons
It does require a programming skill set. I would like the product not to require a heavy programming skill set and be more user-friendly for someone without a programming background.In the beginning, we had issues with several test cases failing during regression. Over a period of time, we built our own framework around Selenium which helped us overcome of these issues.Improvement in Selenium's ability to identify and wait for the page/element to load would be a big plus. This would ensure that our failed test cases will drop by 60%.It would be very great if Selenium would provide some framework examples so newcomers could get started more quickly.​To simplify the development process, everyone needs to do a Selenium Framework to acquire the web application functions and features from Selenium methods.It is not easy to make IE plus Selenium work good as other browsers. Firefox and Chrome are the best ones to work with Selenium.Handling frames and windows needs to be improved.There is no good tool to find the Xpath. They should provide a good tool to find Xpath for dynamic elements and integrate API (REST/ SOAP) testing support.

Read more »

Classes are not as object-oriented as I would like, but I am a programmer and not QA so I expect a lot.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it.It is free.Since it is an open source. It is free to use. However my company see it as the future of load testing.It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license.There is no pricing cost. License is Apache License 2.0.It is free to use.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
290,996 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
22,048
Comparisons
14,147
Reviews
13
Followers
1,040
Avg. Rating
8.5
Views
3,233
Comparisons
608
Reviews
5
Followers
164
Avg. Rating
9.4
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Compared 16% of the time.
Compared 9% of the time.
See more Selenium HQ competitors »
Compared 12% of the time.
See more Zeenyx AscentialTest competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsSeleniumHQAscentialTest
Website/Video
Website/VideoSeleniumHQ
Zeenyx
Overview
Overview

Selenium HQ is a suite of tools to automate web browsers across many platforms. Selenium runs in many browsers and operating systems and can be controlled by many programming languages and testing frameworks. Selenium consist of two types:

  1. Selenium WebDriver - create robust, browser-based regression automation suites & tests and scale & distribute scripts across many environments.
  2. Selenium IDE - create quick bug reproduction scripts and create scripts to aid in automation-aided exploratory testing.
AscentialTest™ by Zeenyx Software is an enterprise level Test Management System that encompasses Test Planning, Development, Data Management, Execution and Defect Tracking for applications running on Windows, the web, java, dotNet, terminals and PowerBuilder. This “next generation” testing solution allows users to build robust automated and manual tests from reusable components created by its powerful object recognition engine without recording or scripting. Our patented ‘snapshot’ technology generates graphical representations of the application under test which allows users to build ‘Steps’ by dragging and dropping objects in a visual test editor. Reusable Steps are combined to form a multitude of automated and manual tests that are easy to create and maintain. With AscentialTest, companies realize a dramatic reduction in test creation and maintenance times, resulting in increased productivity and lower costs.
OFFER
Learn more about Selenium HQ
Learn more about Zeenyx AscentialTest
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersBrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear SoftwareTJX Companies, Nuance Communications, Ericsson Inc., Transatlantic Reinsurance Company, Accenture, Nutrition Coordinating Center, Univ. of MN, iConectiv, Fortress Software, and LMP Corp.
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer
20%
Software R&D Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
23%
Comms Service Provider
17%
Software R&D Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
11%
No Data Available
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
24%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
43%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
13%
Midsize Enterprise
33%
Large Enterprise
54%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
11%
Large Enterprise
56%
Find out what your peers are saying about Selenium HQ vs Zeenyx AscentialTest and others in Functional Testing Tools.
Download now
290,996 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email