Zeenyx AscentialTest Competitors and Alternatives

The top Zeenyx AscentialTest competitors are
Read reviews of Zeenyx AscentialTest competitors and alternatives
Real User
Test Automation Lead/Consultant at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 02 2018

What do you think of Selenium HQ?

Primary Use Case We took Selenium for web product test automation and as it very well suits as it has capacity to execute in different browser, different environment. Also it has lot other capacities to scale up test automation and yield better ROI. • Improvements to My Organization Web-based application automation are mostly done using Selenium. It's the right automation tool as a replacement for manual regression testing that indispensably reduces the testing time due to its cross-browser, parallel, and remote executions. • Valuable Features - Most importantly, it is an open source tool. - Parallel executions (same browser in parallel, different browser in parallel). - Remote executions using Node and Hub. - Integration with CI tools like Jenkins - Multi-platform...
Continuous Delivery Lead at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Aug 23 2016

What do you think of Tricentis Tosca?

Overall, it is quite a different experience in using it. It does not contain any code, and builds from the requirements as a model of what the actual application will contain. The catch being that initially you do not need to define your test cases from the application end and things might not even be in sequence of what the actual final application would look like. I have an analogy for this – a human body is composed of head, body, hands and legs. Each one has its own “attributes”, which in turn have “instances”. This is what is called the ‘Model-based approach’. Each hand will have attributes such as fingers, nails, elbow, fore-hand, wrist, etc. Then, all these attributes will have instances – long fingers, short fingers, thick fingers, etc. Now to build a body, you need to...
Sauce Labs
Real User
Technology Development Program Intern at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Dec 13 2016

What do you think of Sauce Labs?

Valuable Features I have found it very valuable that Sauce Labs gives me the ability to integrate testing on multiple web browsers into our Jenkins Pipeline. • Improvements to My Organization It has made our end to end testing roughly 25 percent faster. • Room for Improvement I think there could be improvements in the way Sauce Labs provides support to its users and could maybe provide tutorial videos on its services. • Use of Solution About 4 months. • Deployment Issues No. • Stability Issues Minor ones but they were on my end. • Scalability Issues Our application is relatively small so no • Customer Service and Technical Support Customer Service: 10/10 Technical Support: 9/10 • Previous Solutions No. • Initial Setup It was very...
Real User
QA at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jul 18 2016

What is most valuable?

1. Parasoft SOA test tool is very good for webservices automation. 2. It provides support for a variety of protocols including JSON. 3. It also provides multiple language support, such as Jython, Phython, Java, Ruby, and Javascript, whichever... more»

How has it helped my organization?

1. In our project we have to work with multiple tools like FTP, Database, Web services and Java. Parasoft is a bundle of these tools. With just one click I can access any utilities mentioned above. Currently it's saving lots of my time. 2.... more»

What needs improvement?

1. We face issues when working with datasource. In my project we used a CSV file as an input test data files. However when the test data file (CSV) is empty then Parasoft stops abruptly. A workaround we found is to fill some dummy data into... more»
Micro Focus
QA Automation Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees
May 14 2018

What do you think of UFT (QTP)?

In my ten years of hands-on combined experience using QTP (QuickTest Professional), for at least 8 years, and UFT (Unified Functional Testing), for at least 2 years, I have observed that there has been a lot of confusion among the testing community on what the difference is between the two tools. Therefore, I thought it would be beneficial to clarify what distinguishes UFT from QTP because it is important for the reader to know. QTP is a functional and regression automation tool originally developed and marketed by Mercury Interactive which HP acquired in 2006. In 2012, HP released UFT (Unified Functional Testing) version 11.5, which combined QuickTest Professional and HP Service Test into a single software package along with newly designed IDE (Integrated Development...
SmartBear Software
Real User
QA Automation Lead at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Aug 24 2017

What is most valuable?

It's cross platform automation capabilities specially ranging across web, UNIX (via putty), and other systems.

How has it helped my organization?

TestComplete replaced QTP as the preferred choice of tool for the organization. It is much faster, works better across technologies (esp. Flex based UI) and is better compatible with newer technologies directly out of the box. We could have... more»

What needs improvement?

The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools like Notepad++. Performance is another aspect which can be improved.

Sign Up with Email