We performed a comparison between FatPipe SD-WAN and VMware SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."The most valuable feature of FatPipe SD-WAN is it's based on SD-WAN technology."
"SD-WAN is cloud-based and you can manage multiple sites within one single pane of glass."
"I love the solution because of its many features like cluster and cloud VPN."
"The cloud gateway is a very good feature for scaling purposes, etc."
"When extra capacity is needed, we can get it very quickly."
"The most valuable feature is load balancing."
"The most valuable feature is the dynamic multipath optimization."
"I have found the dynamic multipoint protocol(DNPO) most useful because it can tell you which is the best circuit to use for different types of traffic."
"I find the application-aware routing feature to be the most valuable."
"FatPipe SD-WAN can improve the price to scale the solution."
"They need to start focusing on the security functionality. They should find a way to embed the next-generation firewall functionality within the architecture. They should move more into applying SASE tenants to what they're doing."
"VMware SD-WAN is complicated to configure."
"In an upcoming release, the solution can be more functional and have additional features."
"The firewall can be more advanced."
"There might be potential enhancements in better integration with other platforms, increased stability, and heightened security."
"There is one feature that would set VMware SD-WAN apart from others solutions, and that is what I call inter-cloud connectivity. All the solutions regarding VMware are good because for example, If I go from my workplace to a retail office and I want to use my applications in the Cloud, that is possible. Perhaps we have customers who have their IT partial environments hosted in different cloud locations, such as Amazon and Azure, and the interconnection between the clouds, this is not possible. If it was possible it would be a market game-changer. Having the SD-WAN solution that is good at optimizing and facilitating traffic between different cloud providers would be great."
"The product should have on-demand tunnels instead of fixed tunnels."
"I would like to see more features added to increase visibility."
FatPipe SD-WAN is ranked 16th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 1 review while VMware SD-WAN is ranked 4th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 50 reviews. FatPipe SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while VMware SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of FatPipe SD-WAN writes "Beneficial technology, reliable, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SD-WAN writes "To fully utilize cloud vendors' hardware networking, Microsoft and VMware support everything". FatPipe SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate and Cisco SD-WAN, whereas VMware SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Netskope .
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.