We performed a comparison between N-able EDR and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."We have FortiEDR installed on all our systems. This protects them from any threats."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Fortinet FortiEDR's scalability is quite good, and you can add licenses to the solution."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Ability to get forensics details and also memory exfiltration."
"The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"Exceptions are easy to create and the interface is easy to follow with a nice appearance."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"The features we have found most valuable have been containment as well as the ability to triage agent activities."
"It is easy to use, flexible, and stable. Because it is a cloud-based solution and it integrates all endpoints of the cloud, we can do an IOC-based search. It can search the entire enterprise and tell us the endpoints that are possibly compromised."
"The threat scanning is excellent. It uses predictive technology and I can utilize attack data to help us fine-tune our systems and network infrastructure. This protects us against current and future attacks."
"The platform’s most valuable features are ease of use, integration, and deployment."
"I found the initial setup to be easy."
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The investigation and forensic analysis have been most helpful."
"It's good that it periodically scans all my drives. I can stay up to date with the status of my drivers and update them if needed."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"The support needs improvement."
"ZTNA can improve latency."
"Detections could be improved."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"The product needs to reduce the usage of RAM and CPU."
"A policy-editing console should be added."
"They have something called Managed Detection and Response. They get intel from their customers, and that intel is shared with the rest of FireEye's customers. I want to subscribe to their intel, but that is not available to us."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"I would like to see simple processing and reporting online."
"We would like to solution to offer better security."
"The solution can be expensive."
"You do not have access to all the features when you use the Trellix web interface. For example, you cannot do device or drive encryption from the web interface. Also, when we're working with customers, it's sometimes challenging to get sales support. Delays mean we might lose an opportunity. Lastly, Trellix lacks some documentation about custom features."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
N-able EDR is ranked 57th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 48 reviews. N-able EDR is rated 0.0, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Elastic Security, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and Cisco Secure Endpoint, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Open EDR.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.