We performed a comparison between Intercept X Endpoint and Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"This is stable and scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"NGAV and EDR features are outstanding."
"The console is easy to read. I also like the scanning part and the ability to move assets from one to the other."
"Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Additionally, when it comes to EDR, there are more tools available to assist with client work."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"Intercept X helps with internal alerts, application access, and triggering support teams."
"Sophos Intercept X is a complete endpoint solution."
"The solution protects us."
"Technical support is responsive and adept."
"One of the best features of Sophos Intercept is that it repairs without slowing down the system."
"After that, the client switched to Sophos to get the protection they lacked. It either works or it doesn’t and Sophos works."
"The thing that I like about it is the synchronized security. You can tie endpoint protection and firewalls and a whole range of other services and products. You can get your servers taken in under this."
"I consider the heuristics to be most valuable, the fact that the solution does not work solely on signatures."
"MVISION Endpoint is so much easier and so much simpler for the lay security personnel to handle."
"The tool has contributed to improving our security posture. While it's just one part of our overall solution, it plays a crucial role. As we continue to evolve, we anticipate it becoming even more important alongside other aspects like network behavior and additional metrics."
"The most valuable feature is the integration between environments."
"If the network has seen something, we can use that to put a block to all the endpoints."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"MVISION offers decent protection."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint is stable."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its dashboard."
"Integration with Azure and SaaS provisioning tools could improve Fortinet FortiEDR."
"Everything with Fortinet having to do with their cloud services. They need to invest more in their internal infrastructure that they are running in the cloud. One of the things I find with their cloud environment compared to others' is that they go cheap on the equipment. So it causes some performance degradation."
"The support needs improvement."
"To improve Fortinet, we need to see more features and technology areas at the endpoint level introduced."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"The solution is not stable."
"They should keep doing what they're doing. Both of them have entered the EDR/MDR space, and they're keeping up with their competitors. I have a hard time understanding why their capabilities aren't garnering more attention."
"The number one thing I would like is if their support could be a little faster and it would be a little easier to get a hold of support when you need them."
"If we can lower the price, it will be fantastic because it will generate more revenue for us."
"This solution is not in the high ratings on many of the top review sites. This solution has to be near the top for me to continue using it."
"I would like to have a built-in firewall, rather than having to integrate one."
"Intercept X Endpoint is a very heavy solution that consumes a lot of RAM and should be made lighter."
"The solution is heavy in the usage of resources, you can notice the performance decrease. This should prove in the future."
"They might want to offer an MSP model for licensing, to offer the solution as a software as a service."
"From an improvement perspective, I want everything in the solution to be free."
"Intrusion detection and intervention seem to be falling behind the competition."
"So far, McAfee MVISION Endpoint ticks off all of our boxes, but its pricing could always be better."
"Endpoint resource utilization causes high levels of instability and that is something that needs improvement."
"One suggestion is they should reduce the constant notifications. Whenever I open my laptop, there are too many notifications from McAfee, and it gets annoying."
"The way that signatures work when using this solution could be improved. They could be more user friendly. We would like the ability to select a client's signature from a menu or file share to save time."
"McAfee MVISION Endpoint could improve by an overall simplification of the solution."
"The solution lacks device control."
More Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Intercept X Endpoint is ranked 7th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 101 reviews while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is ranked 18th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 48 reviews. Intercept X Endpoint is rated 8.4, while Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Intercept X Endpoint writes "A standard offering with good threat analysis but reduces machine performance". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) writes "It integrates well with other solutions, but the vendor needs more of a local presence and faster response". Intercept X Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Seqrite Endpoint Security, whereas Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) is most compared with Trellix Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) and Trend Micro Apex One. See our Intercept X Endpoint vs. Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.