We performed a comparison between Forter and Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NICE, ThreatMetrix, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention."Dashboards, customization and the analytics are all good, it's user friendly."
"The process and technology in the solution are very fast, and it is bug-free."
"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."
"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."
"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."
"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."
"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."
"I like the score generated on the Actimize platform for each customer transaction. Those are transactions per second, accommodating millions of transactions per second. That's the best feature of Actimize."
"The tool helped my clients track some fraudulent activities which couldn’t have been possible without the solution. Once the solution is deployed, the system of the client needs to be upgraded and overhauled to reflect the new system. The end users can see the benefits of it. The integration of the solution is increasing the customer base of our clients since more customers from other banks have decided to join the client bank due to the level of security."
"Lacking granularity on the acceptance/rejection fraud options."
"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."
"Processes don't function when front end is down."
"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."
"It has become too complex for its own good with a lot of versions. They are trying to do too much. Instead of keeping it sort of traditional and keeping the core search engine as a standalone and having analytical bolt-ons, they have decided to jam it all into the same product, which made the product overly complex and difficult to implement."
"This solution is unnecessarily complex."
"Its user interface could be better."
"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."
"Could include additional customization"
More Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Forter is ranked 10th in Fraud Detection and Prevention while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is ranked 1st in Fraud Detection and Prevention with 17 reviews. Forter is rated 9.0, while Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forter writes "Great at detecting fraudulent behavior and has reduced our financial losses". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management writes "Highly intelligent and effective for detecting fraud in transactions". Forter is most compared with Riskified, Signifyd, Sift Digital Trust and Safety, Kount and ThreatMetrix, whereas Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is most compared with BAE Systems NetReveal, FICO Falcon Platform, IBM Safer Payments, ThreatMetrix and Featurespace ARIC Fraud Hub.
See our list of best Fraud Detection and Prevention vendors.
We monitor all Fraud Detection and Prevention reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
