We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiNAC and Ruckus Cloudpath based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Access Control (NAC) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are user device management and there are plenty of policies."
"It's easy to connect to a VPN without any hassles."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is its integration with all other Fortinet solutions."
"It effectively addresses issues arising from endpoint connections to the network, contributing to an enhanced overall security solution for our clients."
"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiNAC is compliance, which we can do with the clients and the endpoints on the network."
"The users say that FortiNAC is configurable and easy to use."
"FortiNAC has enhanced our network visibility because FortiNAC monitors MAC addresses and other network devices, like Cisco, Catalyst, or HPE switches."
"When it works, it's great. It keeps things off the network which are supposed to be off the network."
"The tool's most valuable features include the phenomenal functionality of DPSK. The ease of use, particularly when it is correctly set up, is remarkably simple. Tracking users is straightforward and dynamic. This allows us to identify where a user might encounter issues within the process."
"The ease of use is great, and the automation wizards can do a lot."
"I find the solution to be very rich in features."
"The solution is easy to use, well designed, robust, and has good traffic capacity."
"The solution has good features for authentication, policies, and allowing users to self-provision devices for network access via their logins."
"Ruckus technical support is very good and helpful whenever we need them."
"The reporting can also use improvement."
"The GUI in Fortinet FortiNAC could improve."
"We have some stability issues with the solution, the network drops out too often."
"One of the biggest issues with Fortinet FortiNAC is that it is not intuitive and has a high learning curve."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"Fortinet's local support could be improved."
"Fortinet FortiNAC could improve its hardware for use with cloud-based firewalls."
"Integration is hard in Fortinet FortiNAC, but they are evolving and getting better. For example, with Cisco, Aruba, Huawei, and Extreme devices, Fortinet FortiNAC is working properly, but some other devices have problems."
"The hardest part we've had to deal with is trying to find some physical product recently as everything is going like hotcakes."
"The tool needs to support multi-vendor environments. Currently, my experience with it has been primarily within Ruckus environments. However, I haven't explored it for multi-vendor scenarios. It would be great to see newer builds that are multi-vendor capable of full integration."
"The setup process is a bit complex."
"The solution could improve by adding more detailed information that customers have available on the dashboards."
"The scalability could be better."
"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."
Fortinet FortiNAC is ranked 4th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 43 reviews while Ruckus Cloudpath is ranked 10th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 6 reviews. Fortinet FortiNAC is rated 7.6, while Ruckus Cloudpath is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiNAC writes "I like the solution's native integration with other devices from the same vendor". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Cloudpath writes "Helps to onboard corporate users based on certificate-based authentication". Fortinet FortiNAC is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, Forescout Platform, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), whereas Ruckus Cloudpath is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Sophos Network Access Control. See our Fortinet FortiNAC vs. Ruckus Cloudpath report.
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.