Compare Ruckus Cloudpath vs. Sophos Network Access Control

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: May 2021.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"I find the solution to be very rich in features."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Pros »

"The scalability of the system and the performance of the system and the solution's most valuable features.""What Sophos has done is integrate almost the entire OSI layer infrastructure. It gives me visibility across my infrastructure. It gives me visibility into all the mobile devices that are on my network and into the security I have on those mobile devices.""The solution offers very good visibility.""There is really good visibility for the appliance.""The user interface makes it easy to configure and use.""The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer.""The installation is very straightforward."

More Sophos Network Access Control Pros »

Cons
"I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Cons »

"The solution could increase the integration with other platforms or other systems. This would be very useful.""What needs to be improved on is the fact that Sophos consumes a lot of processor resources and, once it starts scanning, the RAM utilization is very high.""The solution could offer more useful documentation.""The difficult thing was finding the metrics.""I would like to be able to fully customize the reports.""I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device.""The interface on the cloud could be a bit better - just to give more performance on it."

More Sophos Network Access Control Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good."

More Ruckus Cloudpath Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control solutions are best for your needs.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I find the solution to be very rich in features.
Top Answer: The licensing of the solution is user-based and the price is good.
Top Answer: I believe the solution is missing some great features which are present in other solutions like Aruba, UiPath, and Cisco ISE. One example of an improvement could be regarding mobile device… more »
Top Answer: The wifi control is fantastic and makes it very easy to administer.
Top Answer: The licensing is modular. That means, you typically buy a base license and then add on what you need to increase its functionality. If you want to, for example, install a main gateway, or if you want… more »
Top Answer: I would like to see mobile administration capabilities in the next release so that we can administer the device from a mobile device.
Ranking
10th
Views
541
Comparisons
417
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
455
Rating
N/A
5th
Views
1,611
Comparisons
1,020
Reviews
6
Average Words per Review
506
Rating
8.8
Popular Comparisons
Learn More
Overview

Cloudpath Enrollment System is a software/SaaS platform that delivers secure wired and wireless network access for BYOD, guest users and IT-owned devices. It streamlines getting devices on the network and secures every connection with powerful encryption. Cloudpath software gives you granular policy control over what network resources users can access. It lets you deliver a great end-user experience and virtually eliminates helpdesk tickets related to network access. Choose from cloud-based or virtualized on-premises deployment. Cloudpath software supports any user, any device, and any network infrastructure.

Sophos NAC Provides comprehensive, easy-to-deploy network access control that protects enterprise networks from the threats posed by non-compliant, compromised, or misconfigured endpoint computers. The software solution is vendor-neutral and works with existing network infrastructure and security applications. Computers are permitted or denied access to the network, based on a centrally defined, policy-driven assessment - and isolated, quarantined for remediation, automatically remediated, or sent alerts. Administrators can define and manage policies uniquely for managed and guest computers, including checking their security status and ensuring that no unwanted applications are run.
Offer
Learn more about Ruckus Cloudpath
Learn more about Sophos Network Access Control
Sample Customers
Information Not Available
Rushmoor Borough Council
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider41%
Government13%
Computer Software Company11%
Educational Organization8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider30%
Computer Software Company14%
Government10%
Media Company5%
Company Size
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business75%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise13%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, ForeScout, Aruba Networks and others in Network Access Control. Updated: May 2021.
479,124 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Ruckus Cloudpath is ranked 10th in Network Access Control with 1 review while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 5th in Network Access Control with 7 reviews. Ruckus Cloudpath is rated 0.0, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Ruckus Cloudpath writes "Well-featured, price competitive, and great technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "Great security with a user-friendly interface and excellent stability". Ruckus Cloudpath is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Pulse Policy Secure and Forescout Platform, whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Aruba ClearPass, ExtremeControl, Fortinet FortiNAC and Forescout Platform.

See our list of best Network Access Control vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.