We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."
"The cost is the most important factor in this tool."
"The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application."
"The most valuable feature is stability."
"Integrates well with other products."
"The solution is very scalable."
"The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases."
"The most valuable features are the object repository."
"It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."
"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding."
"The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement."
"In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable."
"The pricing could be improved."
"Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful."
"Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise."
"In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure."
"I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."
"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution."
"The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests."
"It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items."
"When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less."
"Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."
Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.
The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features
Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/Start Your Free Trial Today!
Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.
froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 8th in Test Automation Tools with 10 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". froglogic Squish is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Visual Studio Test Professional and SmartBear TestComplete.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.