We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Micro Focus UFT Developer vs. froglogic Squish

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

More froglogic Squish Pros »

"The cost is the most important factor in this tool.""The most valuable feature for UFT is the ability to test a desktop application.""The most valuable feature is stability.""Integrates well with other products.""The solution is very scalable.""The most valuable feature is the automation of test cases.""The most valuable features are the object repository.""It is quite stable, and it has got very user-friendly features, which are important in terms of maintaining our scripts from a long-term perspective. It is very stable for desktop-based, UI-based, and mobile applications. Object repositories and other features are also quite good."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pros »

Cons
"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

More froglogic Squish Cons »

"It would be improved by adding a drag-and-drop interface to help alleviate the coding.""The support from Micro Focus needs a lot of improvement.""In the next release, I would like to see the connectivity improved to be less complex and more stable.""The pricing could be improved.""Easier connectivity and integration with SAP would be helpful.""Integration with other tools can become a costly exercise.""In the next release, I would like to see integration with different cloud-based tools such as Azure.""I have to keep the remote machine open while the tests are running, otherwise, it leads to instability."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"The cost of this solution is a little bit high and we are considering moving to another solution.""The licensing is very expensive, so often, we don't have enough VMs to run all of our tests.""It is cheap, but if you take the enterprise license, it is valid for both software items.""When we compare in the market with other tools that have similar features, it may be a little bit extra, but the cost is ten times less.""Its cost is a bit high. From the licensing perspective, I am using a concurrent license. It is not a seed license. It is something that I can use in our network. It can also be used by other users."

More Micro Focus UFT Developer Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I think the licensing price is okay. I believe for one person, the cost is around 2,000 Euros. That's the initial cost, after that you buy support and it cost 800 Euros, which is much lower, It's a… more »
Top Answer: I'm not completely satisfied because although the ID is good, it could be improved with suggestions of names for some method, for example, or variable, or class. I'd like to see suggestions for… more »
Top Answer: We are customers of Froglogic and I'm an automation quality assurance engineer.
Top Answer: Integrates well with other products.
Top Answer: The issue with all the integration is that it can become very costly and expensive and we'd like to be able to recommend one single tool that will do it all.
Ranking
16th
Views
6,348
Comparisons
3,300
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
450
Rating
8.0
8th
Views
5,193
Comparisons
3,727
Reviews
11
Average Words per Review
642
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
UFT Pro (LeanFT), Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT), LeanFT, HPE LeanFT
Learn More
Overview
Discover All Benefits (Click Here)

Reliable GUI Test Automation that works.

Use Squish for the automation of your cross-platform desktop, mobile, embedded and web GUI tests.

Testing the user interface of today's applications is a very complex and error-prone task. Automating this task is challenging, but approached correctly very rewarding.

The Squish GUI Tester is the tool of choice for several thousand companies worldwide and a 100% cross-platform tool, features

  • Desktop, Mobile, Embedded & Web Applications
  • include Qt, QtQuick, QML, Java, AWT, Swing, SWT, RCP, JavaFx, Windows, Mac, Tk, 4Js, iOS, Android, Embedded (Qt, Windows, Java) and Web, HTML5, Flex & JavaApplets.
  • testing on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, Unix. Mobile and Embedded testing on Android, iOS, embedded Linux and RTOSes such as QNX
  • Eclipse-based IDE
  • based object identification & Toolkit API Support
  • tests in your choice of Python, JavaScript, Perl, Ruby & Tcl
  • BDD tests with built-in (Gherkin) Feature File recording, playback & reporting
  • testing capabilities
  • complete with drill-down details, execution statistics and multiple output formats
  • options with many ALM and Continuous Integration tools for executing and managing tests as well as a complete command-line interface

Find out more today at https://www.froglogic.com/squish/

Start Your Free Trial Today!

Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is a powerful yet lightweight functional test automation solution, that supports a wide range of AUT technologies. Targeted to technical test automation engineers and developers/testers in Agile teams, Micro Focus UFT Pro (LeanFT) is fully embedded in standard IDEs and integrates naturally with the Dev and QA ecosystems.

Offer
Learn more about froglogic Squish
Learn more about Micro Focus UFT Developer
Sample Customers
Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson, ... Success Stories (Click Here)
Walmart, Hitachi, American Airlines, PepsiCo, AT&T, Ericsson, United Airlines
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company14%
Government4%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm18%
Comms Service Provider14%
Healthcare Company9%
Computer Software Company9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company31%
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider10%
Insurance Company7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business42%
Midsize Enterprise17%
Large Enterprise42%
REVIEWERS
Small Business3%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise76%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise4%
Large Enterprise87%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SmartBear and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: November 2021.
552,136 professionals have used our research since 2012.

froglogic Squish is ranked 16th in Test Automation Tools with 1 review while Micro Focus UFT Developer is ranked 8th in Test Automation Tools with 10 reviews. froglogic Squish is rated 8.0, while Micro Focus UFT Developer is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of froglogic Squish writes "An all-in-one feature that can cross-cut from QT applications". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus UFT Developer writes "Great features with good stability and an easy initial setup". froglogic Squish is most compared with Selenium HQ, Ranorex Studio, SmartBear TestComplete, Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence and Visual Studio Test Professional, whereas Micro Focus UFT Developer is most compared with Micro Focus UFT One, Tricentis Tosca, Selenium HQ, Visual Studio Test Professional and SmartBear TestComplete.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.