Fudo PAM vs senhasegura Access Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Fudo Security Logo
1,091 views|638 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
senhasegura Logo
240 views|178 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fudo PAM and senhasegura Access Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM).
To learn more, read our detailed Privileged Access Management (PAM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Oleksiy-Zaionchkovskyy
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.""The main benefit of the solution is that it's very easy to set up. It only takes a couple of hours to install everything.""it's perfect to control and administer computers in our company.""Fudo PAM was the most flexible and intuitive interface out of all of the products in the PAM sector.""We are convinced that Fudo PAM is better than competing products like WALLIX."

More Fudo PAM Pros →

"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More senhasegura Access Management Pros →

Cons
"The configuration is difficult.""I would like to see better server management. You have to know exactly what you're looking for to get the right server.""Professional training and certification would be great.""Fudo PAM’s scalability is not very strong.""The stability is not very good."

More Fudo PAM Cons →

"In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier."

More senhasegura Access Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing is great. We've been given discounts that make it cheaper than using any other solution."
  • More Fudo PAM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Session recording and password management are the two main aspects.
    Top Answer:There are some areas for improvement in the Fudo PAM cake that we want to improve in terms of scaling. Scaling is an optional feature because we closed some big projects with enterprise customers from… more »
    Top Answer:The main use case is for protecting privileged user access, such as securing remote access services. Another important use case is when we work with third-party users and need to provide password… more »
    Top Answer:Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:In Linux credential discovery was a bit hard, but after Senhasegura's latest update, it is much easier.
    Top Answer:We use the solution to organize our passwords and manage our credentials without accounts.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,091
    Comparisons
    638
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    240
    Comparisons
    178
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    539
    Rating
    10.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fudo Privileged Access Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    We are the leading vendor of innovative IT security solutions. We focus on privileged access management and privileged session monitoring, combined under the Fudo Security brand. The Fudo product line merges innovation and an intuitive user experience with strong security features. These are the hallmarks of the future designs of the company.

    Centralized access management, with the purpose of protecting and controlling the use of generic and high privilege credentials, providing secure storage, access segregation and full traceability of use.

    Sample Customers
    KFC, BP, Santander, Burger King, ING, Starbucks, Yahoo, DHL
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Media Company8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Privileged Access Management (PAM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk, Delinea, BeyondTrust and others in Privileged Access Management (PAM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Fudo PAM is ranked 21st in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 5 reviews while senhasegura Access Management is ranked 14th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 1 review. Fudo PAM is rated 8.0, while senhasegura Access Management is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Fudo PAM writes "Easy to install but needs to provide better server management and organization". On the other hand, the top reviewer of senhasegura Access Management writes "With a great support team and stability, the tool also offers scalability to its users". Fudo PAM is most compared with WALLIX Bastion, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Delinea Secret Server, One Identity Safeguard and ManageEngine PAM360, whereas senhasegura Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and ManageEngine PAM360.

    See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.

    We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.