Compare Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs. HPE BladeSystem

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,441 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
438,441 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
483
Comparisons
421
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
6,479
Comparisons
4,837
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
320
Avg. Rating
7.3
Popular Comparisons
Compared 81% of the time.
Compared 4% of the time.
Also Known As
Primergy BX900 SeriesHP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Fujitsu
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview

The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications.

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
Offer
Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Sample Customers
Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi GeospasialEMIS Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company6%
Insurance Company6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider23%
Government8%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2020.
438,441 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 9th in Blade Servers while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 4 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0.0, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives us good server density and a harmonized hardware solution". Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M and Cisco UCS B-Series, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Superdome X, Super Micro SuperBlade and Hitachi BladeSymphony.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.