Compare Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series vs. HPE BladeSystem

Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is ranked 9th in Blade Servers while HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 14 reviews. Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is rated 0, while HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Gives us good server density and a harmonized hardware solution". Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series is most compared with Dell PowerEdge M, HPE BladeSystem and Cisco UCS B-Series, whereas HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series and HPE Superdome X.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
The chassis itself, with no blade server inside, so expensive. The C7000 model costs around $100,000.​The price could be cheaper.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
9th
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
605
Comparisons
535
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
2nd
out of 25 in Blade Servers
Views
6,518
Comparisons
4,244
Reviews
14
Average Words per Review
289
Avg. Rating
8.4
Top Comparisons
Compared 82% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Primergy BX900 SeriesHP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystem
Learn
Fujitsu
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Overview

The Fujitsu Server PRIMERGY BX900 S2 chassis is the rock-solid foundation for Fujitsu's blade ecosystem, providing a reliable, flexible and efficient platform for building a converged infrastructure. The system provides a modular approach to create an IT infrastructure. The chassis includes all needed infrastructure elements such as power supplies and fans, networking, and management. The Fujitsu blade server is easy to upgrade, maintain and customize. Inside, you can mix and match almost any combination of server storage and connection blades to run your choice of operation systems and applications.

HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.
Offer
Learn more about Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Sample Customers
Yokogawa Electric Corporation, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International(ATR), Yamagata University, Universiti Putra Malaysia, China Telecom, Badan Informasi GeospasialEMIS Health
Top Industries
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm20%
Government8%
Energy/Utilities Company7%
Insurance Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company27%
Manufacturing Company22%
Comms Service Provider14%
Government10%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco UCS B-Series vs. HPE BladeSystem and other solutions. Updated: September 2019.
371,062 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email