GEP SMART vs Oracle E-Business Suite Contract Lifecycle Management for Public Sector comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "My advice is to think wisely when it comes to estimating the number of licenses that you will require. If you settle on a number too early and you need additional ones, then the extra licenses might be quite expensive."
  • "If our organization could use it as a full-fledged solution, then it would be valuable and give a return on investment. However, since we are not currently using it as a full-fledged solution, even facing some bugs and problems with the synchronization with some of the internal software, we are not able to use it in a full-fledged manner."
  • More GEP SMART Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Ranking
    Views
    134
    Comparisons
    36
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    18
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SMART by GEP
    Oracle Contract Lifecycle Management for Public Sector
    Learn More
    Oracle
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    GEP SMART is an AI-powered, cloud-native

    software for direct and indirect procurement
    that offers comprehensive source-to-pay
    functionality in one user-friendly platform,
    inclusive of spend analysis, sourcing, contract
    management, supplier management,
    procure-to-pay, savings project management
    and savings tracking, invoicing and other
    related functionalities.

    Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is a fully integrated procure-to-pay system. It provides automated and auditable processes from PR Generation through solicitation to entitlement to payments. With an integrated view of finance, acquisition, and supply it facilitates the ultimate closeout of the award. It was designed with the intent to help government organizations to achieve business efficiency by transitioning from disconnected operations, characterized by stove-piped systems, to ones that are cost effective and executed in the fewest steps possible. CLM enables business process standardization, and because it is an integrated with E-Business Suite Financials and Advanced Procurement and is designed with funds control and auditability in mind.

    Sample Customers
    Exxon Chevron Macys
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Energy/Utilities Company20%
    Non Tech Company13%
    Media Company13%
    Retailer13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization66%
    Energy/Utilities Company7%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise88%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business6%
    Midsize Enterprise69%
    Large Enterprise25%
    No Data Available

    GEP SMART is ranked 18th in Contract Management Software while Oracle E-Business Suite Contract Lifecycle Management for Public Sector is ranked 24th in Contract Management Software. GEP SMART is rated 8.4, while Oracle E-Business Suite Contract Lifecycle Management for Public Sector is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GEP SMART writes "Provides us with more frequent, fresh spend data and alerts us about contract renewals". On the other hand, GEP SMART is most compared with SAP Ariba Procurement, Zycus Source to Pay Suite and Coupa Procure, whereas Oracle E-Business Suite Contract Lifecycle Management for Public Sector is most compared with .

    See our list of best Contract Management Software vendors.

    We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.