Compare GEP SMART vs. Zycus iSource

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GEP SMART Logo
1,211 views|592 comparisons
Zycus iSource Logo
46 views|21 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Use Zycus iSource? Share your opinion.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Procurement Software solutions are best for your needs.
447,228 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: There are additional time savings in managing communications. If you have an open RFP and there are questions, you can manage all of the questions and answers in the thread inside that RFP. All the… more »
Top Answer: On the spend side, we had some difficulty with the usability, initially, but then they rolled out SMART and they built out a new spend cube, and that was light-years better. Part of the reason I… more »
Top Answer: We use SMART by GEP for spend management. It is heavily used for enterprise spend and diversity reporting. We've been using it primarily for the latter, which is good. We report our diversity spend… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
1st
Views
1,211
Comparisons
592
Reviews
10
Average Words per Review
2,246
Avg. Rating
8.2
20th
Views
46
Comparisons
21
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Avg. Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Compared 59% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Also Known As
SMART by GEPiSource, Zycus eSourcing
Learn
GEP Worldwide
Zycus
Overview

GEP SMART is an AI-powered, cloud-native

software for direct and indirect procurement
that offers comprehensive source-to-pay
functionality in one user-friendly platform,
inclusive of spend analysis, sourcing, contract
management, supplier management,
procure-to-pay, savings project management
and savings tracking, invoicing and other
related functionalities.

A Gartner leader for four years in a row, recognized by Forrester for its cutting-age procurement technology, Zycus was founded in 1998 by Aatish Dedhia to challenge normative procurement practices for more advanced solutions helping global business game up their delivery and market presence. His vision led Zycus to a global clientele starting with GE, Coco-Cola, Porsche, Emirates, and now 300 other global customers spanning across 20 countries.

Playing in key markets of North America, APAC, & Europe, Zycus has established 21 years of unquestionable reputation in providing unique and innovative, AI powered Source-to-Pay and Procure-to-Pay suites across verticals like manufacturing, automotive, banking and finance, oil and gas, food processing, electronics, telecommunications, chemicals, health and pharma, education, and more.

Offer
Learn more about GEP SMART
Learn more about Zycus iSource
Sample Customers
Exxon Chevron Macys energizer, ammeraal beltech, weatherford
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Energy/Utilities Company15%
Non Tech Company15%
Media Company15%
Retailer15%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Logistics Company40%
Computer Software Company17%
Comms Service Provider13%
Healthcare Company7%
No Data Available
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise8%
Large Enterprise92%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business16%
Large Enterprise84%
No Data Available
GEP SMART is ranked 1st in Procurement Software with 10 reviews while Zycus iSource is ranked 20th in Procurement Software. GEP SMART is rated 8.2, while Zycus iSource is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of GEP SMART writes "RFP templates save us time; RFP management features capture intent to respond and signing of NDAs". On the other hand, GEP SMART is most compared with SAP Ariba Procurement, Zycus Source to Pay Suite, Oracle Procurement Cloud, Basware e-Procurement and ElectrifAi ProcurementAi, whereas Zycus iSource is most compared with .

See our list of best Procurement Software vendors.

We monitor all Procurement Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.