We performed a comparison between GitHub and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."The solution can scale."
"This product is very good for storing and versioning code."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code."
"The most valuable feature is the source code management. It's very helpful and it's a great product."
"GitHub allows us the option to push files from a non-UA method or directly upload files from the UA. You can integrate GitHub with Jenkins to do CI/CD."
"This solution is very easy to use which I like about it. The capacity to own artifacts and share them with others is another good feature. You don't have to write all your code from scratch, you can use available templates and alter the code according to your needs."
"The best feature is the ability to track the history of all code changes, and it's easy to use. Additionally, as it's open source, anyone can use that feature resulting in distributed development. This opens the door to collaboration with different code and developer, feature, and master branches of development."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."
"The solution should have less integration with the AI part, but it needs to add features with other automation tools so that it can be easily integrated."
"I would want to see some form of code security scanning implemented."
"If something has to be moved into approvals, and if they don't approve it in a few hours, then they should move the approval request to some other user, or they should have a way to escalate it."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"We would like this solution to have a more user-friendly interface."
"The solution can improve by adding video guides, official guides, or short courses that cater to beginners who are new to the system. These resources could offer step-by-step guidance on how to use GitHub, including common procedures such as pulling and committing. Currently, many of us have to resort to searching for information on how to do these tasks via Google. An official guide provided by GitHub itself would be a valuable asset to newcomers and would save them time and effort."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 64 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Atlassian SourceTree, Bitbucket and Fortify on Demand, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket, Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
