We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best feature is ease of use."
"Google Cloud Storage is highly reliable."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is that I can link with my PC."
"Google Cloud Storage is fast, and it's scalable."
"We are satisfied with the parameters of Google Cloud Storage."
"One of the most valuable features of the solution is its ease of use."
"Google Cloud Storage is easy to use, and it's free. I also enjoy the speed I am able to share with family across the globe. The storage is synced."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are the ease of use and I can share files with my colleagues."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is an easy-to-use consolidation solution that's dashboard-driven."
"It's a scalable product."
"The interface is good."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The user experience needs to be simplified."
"Could be improved from a storage perspective and a cost perspective."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The solution is good, however, it would benefit from increased storage without the additional cost."
"It would be helpful to offer more packages to increase the storage."
"An area for improvement is that when you share with others, they can see all your folders instead of just those you share. Only the folders you specifically share should be visible."
"The solution should improve its security and accountability."
"Google Cloud Storage could be improved by increasing the drive capacity."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."
More Oracle Database Backup Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Oracle Database Backup Service is ranked 13th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 10 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Oracle Database Backup Service is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database Backup Service writes "A backup solution for data storage and restoration with point-in-time recover". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Google Workspace, whereas Oracle Database Backup Service is most compared with Oracle Cloud Object Storage, Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Wasabi. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
