We performed a comparison between Google Kubernetes Engine and HPE Ezmeral Container Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, Amazon Web Services (AWS), VMware and others in Container Management."The main advantage of GKE is that it is a managed service. This means that Google is responsible for managing the master node in the Kubernetes cluster system. As a result, we can focus on deploying applications to the slaves, while Google handles any updates and security patches. The fact that GKE is fully integrated into the Google ecosystem, including solutions such as BigQuery and VertexAI. This makes it easier for us to integrate these tools into our process. This integration ultimately speeds up our time to market and reduces the time and effort spent on managing infrastructure. The managed aspect of GKE allows us to simply deploy and utilize it without having to worry about the technicalities of infrastructure management."
"We hardly have a breakdown. It's been very stable."
"The product has no downtime."
"Stability-wise, this solution is really good."
"The solution simplified deployment, making it more automated. Previously, Docker required manual configuration, often done by developers on their computers. However, with Google Kubernetes Engine, automation extends to configuration, deployment, scalability, and viability, primarily originating from Docker rather than Kubernetes. Its most valuable feature is the ease of configuration."
"The solution is more user-friendly than AWS or Azure. I can also easily scale out the service in the future when the number of customers grows. GKE is the leader of Kubernetes service and it can be easily updated. I love the tool's user interfaces."
"Before using this solution, it was a lot of manual tasks and a lot of people participated in the process."
"The initial setup is very easy. We can create our cluster using the command line, or using our console."
"If customers focus on primary apps or if they are using them for data science, this is a good solution."
"I would like the solution to integrate with another Kubernetes product. I would also like it to monitor other platforms. It needs to also include scale-up container in the tool's next release."
"Google Kubernetes Engine is less stable in some highly complex deployments with many nodes."
"The tool's configuration features need improvement."
"The notifications are not informative."
"An area in which Google Kubernetes Engine could improve is configuration."
"The product’s visible allocation feature needs improvement."
"There are some security issues, but it might just be because we are not up to speed yet as much as we should be and so we haven't found it in the documentation yet. That's why I don't want to confuse this. Still, it could be a little bit easier to understand and implement."
"t is not very stable."
"The modernization in Ezmeral could be improved."
Google Kubernetes Engine is ranked 9th in Container Management with 32 reviews while HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is ranked 16th in Container Management. Google Kubernetes Engine is rated 8.0, while HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Google Kubernetes Engine writes "The auto-scaling feature helps during peak hours, but the support is not great". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Ezmeral Container Platform writes "Easy to install with good support, but the deployment of applications could be simplified". Google Kubernetes Engine is most compared with Linode, Kubernetes, Rancher Labs, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Illumio, whereas HPE Ezmeral Container Platform is most compared with OpenShift Container Platform, Kubernetes, VMware Tanzu Mission Control and Amazon EKS.
See our list of best Container Management vendors.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
