Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 Comparison

Sponsored
Devo Read 5 Devo reviews. 6,393 views\|3,198 comparisons	Graylog Read 3 Graylog reviews. 17,767 views\|14,228 comparisons	ManageEngine Log360 Read 5 ManageEngine Log360 reviews. 3,390 views\|2,621 comparisons

Most Helpful Review

Jordan Mauriello

SVP of Managed Security at Critical Start

Researched Graylog but chose Devo: Having the ability to do real-time analytics drives down attacker dwell time

It has allowed us to have a better handle on how much data we are bringing in for a customer, so we are able to analyze all the things that are... Read more »

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm

Stable, scalable, easy to install and maintain

The centralized logs where one can find bugs quicker and find the line of code that is a problem has made us more efficient. The turn around time... Read more »

Use ManageEngine Log360? Share your opinion.

Free Report: Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Being able to build and modify dashboards on the fly with Activeboards streamlines my analyst time because my analysts aren't doing it across spreadsheets or five different tools to try to build a timeline out themselves. They can just ingest it all, build a timeline out across all the logging, and all the different information sources in one dashboard. So, it's a huge time saver. It also has the accuracy of being able to look at all those data sources in one view. The log analysis, which would take 40 hours, we can probably get through it in about five to eight hours using Devo.""Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of the user interface. The UI has a graphically interface with the raw data in a table. The table can be as big as you want it, depending on your use case. You can easily get a report combining your data, along with calculations and graphical dashboards. You don't need a lot of training, because the UI is relatively very intuitive.""The ability to have high performance, high-speed search capability is incredibly important for us. When it comes to doing security analysis, you don't want to be doing is sitting around waiting to get data back while an attacker is sitting on a network, actively attacking it. You need to be able to answer questions quickly. If I see an indicator of attack, I need to be able to rapidly pivot and find data, then analyze it and find more data to answer more questions. You need to be able to do that quickly. If I'm sitting around just waiting to get my first response, then it ends up moving too slow to keep up with the attacker. Devo's speed and performance allows us to query in real-time and keep up with what is actually happening on the network, then respond effectively to events.""The real-time analytics of security-related data are super. There are a lot of data feeds going into it and it's very quick at pulling up and correlating the data and showing you what's going on in your infrastructure. It's fast. The way that their architecture and technology works, they've really focused on the speed of query results and making sure that we can do what we need to do quickly. Devo is pulling back information in a fast fashion, based on real-time events.""The user interface is really modern. As an end-user, there are a lot of possibilities to tailor the platform to your needs, and that can be done without needing much support from Devo. It's really flexible and modular. The UI is very clean.""One of the biggest features of the UI is that you see the actual code of what you're doing in the graphical user interface, in a little window on the side. Whatever you're doing, you see the code, what's happening. And you can really quickly switch between using the GUI and using the code. That's really useful." More Devo Pros »	"I am very proud of how very stable the solution is.""Open source and user friendly.""Graylog's search functionality, alerting functionality, user management, and dashboards are useful." More Graylog Pros »	"The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward.""You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful.""The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well.""The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already.""The reports that you can run are really nice." More ManageEngine Log360 Pros »
Cons
"Their documentation could be better. They are growing quickly and need to have someone focused on tech writing to ensure that all the different updates, how to use them, and all the new features and functionality are properly documented.""There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler.""There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. The breadth of overall log parsers that exists right now is an area that they could improve. Natively, there's more that could be done by Devo then what it can and can't understand from a parsing perspective.""Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs.""The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc." More Devo Cons »	"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second.""Lacks sufficient documentation.""Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution." More Graylog Cons »	"Most times log sheets are not assigned well.""The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment.""We can log in as a local user, and it's fine, but when we login with an Active Directory user, we cannot.""The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed.""It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment." More ManageEngine Log360 Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""We have seen ROI. We have seen cost savings in maintenance, upkeep, and support.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money." More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »	"I use the free version of Graylog." More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice »	"There is a cost for each feature used." More ManageEngine Log360 Pricing and Cost Advice »

See Which Vendors Are Best For You Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs. See Recommendations 456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
What do you like most about Devo? Top Answer: Even if it's a relatively technical tool or platform, it's very intuitive and graphical. It's very appealing in terms of… more » Read all 3 answers What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo? Top Answer: We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the… more » Read all 3 answers What needs improvement with Devo? Top Answer: There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the… more » Read all 3 answers	What do you like most about Graylog? Top Answer: Open source and user friendly. Read all 2 answers What needs improvement with Graylog? Top Answer: It would be helpful if they would work more on the documentation because it's not very clear and ideally I'd like to be… more » Read all 2 answers What is your primary use case for Graylog? Top Answer: I use this solution regularly for analyzing incidents, collecting them to figure out what's going on. For now, I'm using… more » Read all 2 answers	Ask a question Earn 20 points
Popular Comparisons
Splunk vs. Devo Compared 54% of the time. LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. Devo Compared 18% of the time. ELK Logstash vs. Devo Compared 9% of the time. IBM QRadar vs. Devo Compared 5% of the time. ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) vs. Devo Compared 1% of the time. See more Devo competitors » + Add more products to compare	Splunk vs. Graylog Compared 39% of the time. ELK Logstash vs. Graylog Compared 21% of the time. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer vs. Graylog Compared 7% of the time. LogRhythm NextGen SIEM vs. Graylog Compared 5% of the time. Solarwinds Papertrail vs. Graylog Compared 1% of the time. See more Graylog competitors » + Add more products to compare	ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs. ManageEngine Log360 Compared 32% of the time. Splunk vs. ManageEngine Log360 Compared 23% of the time. SolarWinds Security Event Manager vs. ManageEngine Log360 Compared 6% of the time. IBM QRadar vs. ManageEngine Log360 Compared 5% of the time. SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs. ManageEngine Log360 Compared 4% of the time. See more ManageEngine Log360 competitors » + Add more products to compare
Also Known As
Logtrust	Graylog2
Learn
Devo	Graylog	ManageEngine
Overview
Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.	Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is: Considerably faster analysis speeds. More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform. Simpler administration and infrastructure management. Lower cost than alternatives. Full-scale customer service. No expensive training or tool experts required.	Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.
Offer
See Devo in Action Watch a Demo See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.	Learn more about Graylog Learn More	Learn more about ManageEngine Log360 Learn More
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText	Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur	First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company27% Comms Service Provider24% Financial Services Firm6% Government6%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Comms Service Provider27% Computer Software Company26% Government7% Educational Organization5%	VISITORS READING REVIEWS Computer Software Company27% Comms Service Provider15% Construction Company6% Media Company6%
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS Small Business39% Midsize Enterprise21% Large Enterprise39%	No Data Available	No Data Available

Free Report: Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360

Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.

Download now

456,249 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Graylog is ranked 12th in Log Management with 3 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 16th in Log Management with 5 reviews. Graylog is rated 8.4, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Graylog writes "Captures our financial logs and preserves them and it covers many environments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Deployment is quite simple and straightforward and it has a good graphics interface ". Graylog is most compared with Splunk, ELK Logstash, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and Solarwinds Papertrail, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Splunk, SolarWinds Security Event Manager , IBM QRadar and SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server. See our Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sponsored
Devo Read 5 Devo reviews. 6,393 views\|3,198 comparisons	Graylog Read 3 Graylog reviews. 17,767 views\|14,228 comparisons	ManageEngine Log360 Read 5 ManageEngine Log360 reviews. 3,390 views\|2,621 comparisons

Compare Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360