Graylog vs ManageEngine Log360 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Graylog Logo
10,317 views|8,658 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
ManageEngine Logo
3,012 views|2,093 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Graylog and ManageEngine Log360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview.""What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc.""The product is scalable. The solution is stable.""Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default.""The solution's most valuable feature is its new interface.""Message forwarding through the in-built module.""Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps.""Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching."

More Graylog Pros →

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy.""You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful.""The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already.""The deployment is quite simple and pretty straightforward.""We haven't had any stability issues.""It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect.""The solution could be improved by including XDR, remediation and Sandbox.""It is easier to deploy than are other SIEMs, which is great. You can also get an overview of your environment, which is very handy."

More ManageEngine Log360 Pros →

Cons
"Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt.""The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture.""Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest.""Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution.""Lacks sufficient documentation.""There should be some user groups and an auto sign-in feature.​""More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great.""I would like to see some kind of visualization included in Graylog."

More Graylog Cons →

"It's difficult to find which conditions have been applied to a report because they are provided by default by ManageEngine. However, with other SIEMs if you want to create a report, they provide details, like which conditions are triggering certain reports. This needs to be there in ManageEngine. It would be good to know which parameter has been applied to the report that is updating the system.""The solution needs to improve hub storage. It should integrate AI and ML capabilities.""The solution lacks some features when compared to other products.""On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits.""The support needs improvement.""The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment.""Their technical support should be improved.""The integration with SharePoint and Teams should be improved."

More ManageEngine Log360 Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Having paid official support is wise for projects."
  • "I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."
  • "If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
  • "​You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."
  • "Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements.​"
  • "I use the free version of Graylog."
  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "We're using the Community edition."
  • More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There is a cost for each feature used."
  • "Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."
  • "My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."
  • "ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."
  • "Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."
  • More ManageEngine Log360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
    Top Answer:We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
    Top Answer:Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and… more »
    Top Answer:Deploying ManageEngine Log360 is challenging in terms of knowledge. They offer some out-of-the-box configurations, but determining the specific firewall or antivirus in use and importing logs from… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    10,317
    Comparisons
    8,658
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    802
    Rating
    7.3
    25th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    3,012
    Comparisons
    2,093
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    523
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Graylog2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

    • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
    • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
    • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
    • Lower cost than alternatives.
    • Full-scale customer service.
    • No expensive training or tool experts required.

    Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

    Sample Customers
    Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
    First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government8%
    Educational Organization7%
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company22%
    Healthcare Company22%
    Non Profit11%
    University11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government11%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business32%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business79%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise49%
    Buyer's Guide
    Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews while ManageEngine Log360 is ranked 25th in Log Management with 15 reviews. Graylog is rated 8.0, while ManageEngine Log360 is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Log360 writes "Facilitates incident backtracking and identifying the cause of incidents but insufficient intelligence-driven analysis to suppress unnecessary alerts". Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Splunk Enterprise Security and ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, whereas ManageEngine Log360 is most compared with ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer, Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, Fortinet FortiSIEM and Rapid7 InsightIDR. See our Graylog vs. ManageEngine Log360 report.

    See our list of best Log Management vendors.

    We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.