We performed a comparison between Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] and Reduxio [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."I like its speed. It has all the features that I need."
"Provides fast access and is user-friendly."
"It has improved my organization because now have lower latency, we get fewer complaints from customers, and we see a constant response time."
"I like the speed, and I like the API and how programmable it is."
"The management is simple in Pure Storage FlashArray."
"The tool is simple and easy to use. It has neat features like protection from device removal. Moreover, you can undo the deletes. The solution is easy to work with and not as complicated as CAC"
"It is an easy to use product for all of my team members."
"The most valuable features of Pure Storage FlashArray are management and administration user-friendliness, provisioning, and performance."
"The most valuable features are simplified provisioning and management, de-duplication, and built-in encryption."
"We love the fact that we do not have to worry about ransomware and can rollback to any point in time."
"The machine has been easy to use."
"I like the performance. I think it's what you call a hybrid SAN. It has solid state drives and, of course, regular optical drives, which would make performance a lot better, faster."
"The support has been so responsive and great, they feel like one of our staff members."
"In terms of deployment and also data storage, the deduplication ability of it has reduced that footprint."
"With only a few clicks, I can provision or modify storage."
"It has a very intuitive interface, it integrates more smoothly with our steps. With a different product from a different manufacturer, there are a lot more steps required to set up a volume, to make it available in VMware and to utilize it there."
"In the event of a deletion, corruption, or ransomware, I am never going to lose more than one second of changes."
"What it needs to do is work a little closer with solutions, like VMware, so it understands the particular workloads that are on it. Today, it does not understand the applications which are running against it."
"I would like to see support for NVMe, end-to-end."
"The data reduction that we had initially anticipated when we bought Pure and we move over, is way lower than the expected reduction. It depends on the workloads, of course. But that has been a challenge at times."
"There are many features which need to be added, particularly on the replication side."
"The product should improve its response time. I have also encountered issues with its configuration."
"Going forward, don't complicate things for the customers."
"Pure Storage will have issues with positioning in the near future since its a relatively new company. For now, customers need a PoC to trust using the solution, as it can't stand on its brand name alone. They need to improve Pure Storage's marketing."
"The file functionality could be better."
"The exterior display needs to be improved."
"Scalability is a little unusual. We came from the NetApp world where, if you needed more disk space, you just added more drives into the chassis, whereas with Reduxio, if you need more disk space, you have to buy a new chassis."
"A centralized management would be nice, the ability to manage all cluster in one management portal."
"We had a single failure of the device but believe that it was tied to the server losing contact with our NTP server due to DNS issues. As Reduxio is very time-dependent, losing sync made the entire array unstable."
"Would love to have role-based access and an active directory integration."
"It would be nice feature if the GUI had an option to export the current unit configuration to a file or an email recipient. In case of a disaster, this way it would be quicker to get a replacement unit up and running again."
"If Reduxio could manage multiple Reduxio systems within the same dashboard, or manage them as a single mode, it be very, very helpful for us."
"I am waiting on a feature set in the new version which should allow me to replicate between Reduxio iSCSI SANs for disaster recovery and also to 3rd party iSCSI SANs which are cheaper for an archive or DR target."
"I would love an iPhone app to monitor my system from outside the firewall."
More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in All-Flash Storage while Reduxio [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in All-Flash Storage. Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Reduxio [EOL] is rated 9.8. The top reviewer of Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] writes "Good price-performance ratio, provides simplified provisioning and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Reduxio [EOL] writes "Its access speed and now its recently released features makes Reduxio not only an equal, but also better than your older version SANs". Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Reduxio [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.