Compare HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"With just one cable, for redundancy let's say two, you can feed sixteen servers in a single c7000 chassis.""It is a stable, dependable solution.""It is not expensive.""The technical support is good.""It is very stable.""It is easy to scale if you have the licensing.""The solution uses a smaller space in our data centers. It uses less feeder and network cable, which reduces costs.""The solution has good scalability."

More HPE BladeSystem Pros »

"The stability and speed are always good. The processor is good and it's still working with our loads.""The Lenovo Flex System is very stable."

More Lenovo Flex System Pros »

Cons
"The only side that must be improved is the active-passive interconnect module architecture.""There could be more management capability to work with integrations.""Some part of virtual connections needs improvement.""It is lacking in the ability to replicate virtual machines more easily.""The response time in terms of getting technical support assistance could be improved.""They are not selling BladeSystem anymore. The end of the sale of this platform was this year, 2020."

More HPE BladeSystem Cons »

"The user-interface needs improvement, because they have an application from which we have to manage the whole system and all the infrastructure. This application is not working at our premises, because of some problem with the hardware itself. So although we brought it with our systems, and we used it to manage all the systems: the storage, the switches, and everything, nevertheless we have to support every part alone and enter the interface in one-by-one.""It does not have the same module flexibility that was present in IBM Blade. On the Blade System, I was able to choose between the Cisco module, or BMC module. Since the switch to Lenovo, I have not had the same choice of modules, only the BMC modules."

More Lenovo Flex System Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It is not expensive, really, in this class of server products."

More HPE BladeSystem Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have the whole maintenance for the 3 years, starting the deployment. We also have the VMware license for 3 years and I think we have another license to buy. There are no additional costs besides licensing.""The price is interesting. I am able to quote a client based on their needs and offer them either Lenovo or Dell."

More Lenovo Flex System Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
2nd
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
6,044
Comparisons
4,579
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
470
Rating
8.4
5th
out of 23 in Blade Servers
Views
857
Comparisons
516
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
663
Rating
8.5
Popular Comparisons
Compared 79% of the time.
Compared 5% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 46% of the time.
Also Known As
HP ProLiant BL Series Servers, HP ProLiant BladeSystem, HP BladeSystemFlex System Blade Servers, Flex System SN Series
Learn
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Lenovo
Overview
HP ProLiant BladeSystem share power, cooling, network, and storage infrastructure via the blade enclosure. Since equipment is not needed for each server, you get a dramatic reduction in power distribution units, power cables, LAN and SAN switches, connectors, adapters, and cables. And you can add the newest-generation technologies by simply changing individual components.

Flex System is Lenovo’s proven, 2nd generation blade, that efficiently runs your infrastructure applications with up to 80% better density than standard rack server deployments.

Offer
Learn more about HPE BladeSystem
Learn more about Lenovo Flex System
Sample Customers
EMIS Health
Information Not Available
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm21%
Government9%
Insurance Company7%
Comms Service Provider6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider25%
Government9%
Financial Services Firm6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company21%
Comms Service Provider20%
Government14%
Retailer7%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise20%
Large Enterprise69%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
455,108 professionals have used our research since 2012.

HPE BladeSystem is ranked 2nd in Blade Servers with 5 reviews while Lenovo Flex System is ranked 5th in Blade Servers with 2 reviews. HPE BladeSystem is rated 8.4, while Lenovo Flex System is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HPE BladeSystem writes "Easy to set up and offers good scalability with a small footprint". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Lenovo Flex System writes "We can now create machines easily without waiting to provide more hardware". HPE BladeSystem is most compared with HPE Synergy, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Superdome X, Dell PowerEdge M and Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series, whereas Lenovo Flex System is most compared with HPE Synergy, HPE Superdome X and Cisco UCS B-Series. See our HPE BladeSystem vs. Lenovo Flex System report.

See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.