Sisense vs ibi WebFOCUS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Information Builders Logo
302 views|236 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Sisense Logo
1,028 views|919 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ibi WebFOCUS and Sisense based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Embedded BI solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Sisense vs. ibi WebFOCUS Report (Updated: March 2024).
771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. It's highly scalable and can handle significant data volumes.""It stands out for its ability to work across different platforms, support mainframe data, offer cloud integration, automate report scheduling, and provide a robust scripting language.""The most valuable feature is building ad hoc reports.""The solution can read and write 500 different types of outputs."

More ibi WebFOCUS Pros →

"Support is very responsive and clearly one of the strengths of Sisense. I have always received a fast response and the staff is very helpful.""The solution's technical support team is good.""This solution is easy to learn how to use.""ElastiCube Manager is a very easy to use ETL tool, which includes the ability to easily transform raw data into reusable data.""​Allows users to build their own solutions without as much reliance on technology staff.""The best part about this solution is how easy it is to mash up the data from many sources. Sisense is fast compared to other solutions.""I have found the dashboard creating feature helpful.""A very simple setup: Easy to download, install, and updates are pain free."

More Sisense Pros →

Cons
"The solution can be improved by adding more automated options for reporting.""When it comes to customer support, we don't always reach the right person. Sometimes, we get junior-level reps who aren't as knowledgeable as we are.""The challenge lies not in what the tool can do but in how you use it and understand the data.""If there were to be any improvements right now, their documentation needs to get in sync with their product."

More ibi WebFOCUS Cons →

"The initial version we purchased only ran on Windows servers, which was less than ideal for our DevOps team. I believe that has been remedied in the latest release.""I would love to have more customization capabilities for building dashboards, especially in creating custom widget sizes.""I would also like to be able to run a bursts of reports based on different field values with PDF output right in the tool, rather than filtering on each field value and generating each PDF manually.""The administrative side of Sisense is a little cumbersome and confusing.""I would like to see more development and growth for the support of Knowledge Base and Community forums.""I would like Sisense to improve its performance, particularly when we are dealing with large-scale data.""The solution's setup process could be easier.""This solution does not have tabs. In order to have tabs, you have to download an add-on to mimic the tabs. They should be integrated to improve the solution."

More Sisense Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive."
  • More ibi WebFOCUS Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solution is more expensive than Tableau, Qlik and Dundas. It is an expensive tool. They charge $75,000 while Tableau is $45,000."
  • More Sisense Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Embedded BI solutions are best for your needs.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I would rate the pricing a five out of ten, with ten being expensive.
    Top Answer:I use it for supplying and developing business intelligence (BI) solutions, data management and reporting applications, and for the development of complete web-based applications. It's a versatile and… more »
    Top Answer:The solution's technical support team is good.
    Top Answer:Sisense is good in terms of visualization, but it has some drawbacks. For example, it doesn't have any way to sort or filter tables directly on the server side. Also, you can't have multiple tabs; it… more »
    Top Answer:We use the solution to centralize all processes.
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 31 in Embedded BI
    Views
    302
    Comparisons
    236
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    687
    Rating
    8.3
    9th
    out of 31 in Embedded BI
    Views
    1,028
    Comparisons
    919
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    373
    Rating
    7.4
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebFOCUS
    Learn More
    Overview

    WebFOCUS is a strategic enterprise business intelligence (BI) and analytics platform that enables any executive, manager, analyst, employee, partner, or customer to execute smarter business from trusted data. The platform includes cutting-edge capabilities that provide organizations with everything they need to turn data into insight, and insight into impact.

    Sisense is an end-to-end business analytics software that enables users to easily prepare and analyze large, complex datasets. Sisense’s Single-Stack BI software includes data preparation, data management, analysis, visualization and reporting capabilities.

    Sample Customers
    Ace Hardware, AutoZone, Fred Hutch, MasterCard, OFS Brands, PostFinance, Real D, Yellow Pages, ABC Financial, AcuSport, BBVA, Babcock
    Ebay, WIX, Wave Accounting, ESPN.com, Magellan Luxury Hotel, Paylogic, Sony, Merck, EDA, One Hour Translation, NASA, Plastic Jungle, Philips, Yahoo
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government62%
    Insurance Company15%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Logistics Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Government9%
    REVIEWERS
    University17%
    Media Company13%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Healthcare Company6%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business57%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Sisense vs. ibi WebFOCUS
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sisense vs. ibi WebFOCUS and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    771,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ibi WebFOCUS is ranked 10th in Embedded BI with 18 reviews while Sisense is ranked 9th in Embedded BI with 39 reviews. ibi WebFOCUS is rated 8.8, while Sisense is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of ibi WebFOCUS writes "A flexible mainframe product with unique file features and a rock solid scheduling feature". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sisense writes "Business intelligence solution that has improved automation and provided meaningful insights". ibi WebFOCUS is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, SAP BusinessObjects Business Intelligence Platform, Alteryx and Databricks, whereas Sisense is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Tableau, Apache Superset, Qlik Sense and Amazon QuickSight. See our Sisense vs. ibi WebFOCUS report.

    See our list of best Embedded BI vendors.

    We monitor all Embedded BI reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.