We performed a comparison between IBM API Connect and webMethods.io API based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a complete all-in-one solution."
"IBM API Connect is a reliable and scalable solution."
"Our version supports containerized integration. I can write APIs, which can be moved into a testing environment without needing a forklift. It can check if APIs are compliant before moving them into production."
"In-built policies and security functions."
"It gives a holistic environment for us to set up the APIs and that's the main value that it adds. It gives end to end for us."
"The centralized management: this provides a management module that can deploy and apply security policies to all APIs, including all the gateways that are deployed on-premises and on any cloud because the gateway component can run at a VMware or in a Kubernetes cluster."
"It allows enterprises to expose some of their tech to outside stakeholders."
"I have found the API Management to be most valuable."
"The performance is good."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"Our main pain points are in these two areas: creating a better developer portal and improving stability in terms of synchronization and monetization."
"Automation for our Domino applications could be improved."
"The implementation of IBM API Connect is complex, as it's an enterprise solution with many components that require more than one person. It's not a single product that you work on, and this is an area for improvement, but normally, it's good. Having a more structured model for IBM API Connect support is also room for improvement that would help customers better."
"The installation was difficult with the IBM toolkit."
"The solution would be better if it had cloud functionalities."
"The monetization of the API could be improved. The pricing for the consumer is also very important to improve this solution."
"In terms of what needs improvement, some of the product documentation could be better."
"The developmental process is not quite user-friendly."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
IBM API Connect is ranked 5th in API Management with 73 reviews while webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews. IBM API Connect is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io API is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM API Connect writes "Good speed and performance, but it's based on a bit dated architecture". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". IBM API Connect is most compared with Apigee, IBM DataPower Gateway, Microsoft Azure API Management, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Amazon API Gateway, whereas webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager. See our IBM API Connect vs. webMethods.io API report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.