We performed a comparison between IBM Cloud Object Storage and LizardFS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Dell Technologies, Red Hat and others in File and Object Storage.Earn 20 points
IBM Cloud Object Storage is ranked 9th in File and Object Storage with 7 reviews while LizardFS is ranked 19th in Software Defined Storage (SDS). IBM Cloud Object Storage is rated 8.0, while LizardFS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of IBM Cloud Object Storage writes "Offers the ease with which you can move data between on-premises storage and the cloud and then retrieve it back on-premises when necessary". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LizardFS writes "There is an automated built-in failover mechanism, but you must build it yourself if you have no support contract in place". IBM Cloud Object Storage is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, MinIO, Dell ECS, IBM Spectrum Scale and NetApp StorageGRID, whereas LizardFS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage and Red Hat Gluster Storage.
We monitor all File and Object Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.