Compare IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Database

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
IBM Db2 Database Logo
9,790 views|6,722 comparisons
Oracle Database Logo
15,460 views|10,160 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Database and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the integration with other IBM products.""The scalability and availability of this solution are the most valuable features.""The most valuable features of this solution are security and stability.""The solution is very stable, in both hardware and database.""The self-management and optimization features are probably the best on the market""We had a crash of the backup system and the IBM DB2 was always up and consistent. It's robust, and for us, it was always up and running.""When you submit a ticket the response time is quick.""IBM Db2 was much cheaper as a package than using other products. This is because IBM supplied a package with its product. It's an application. So it was much more efficient and a stronger competitor in that regard."

More IBM Db2 Database Pros »

"The feature I find most valuable about this solution is the reliability.""This solution has the best performance, bar none.""Oracle enables us to handle more than a million daily transactions.""Oracle Database is fast and easy to use.""The most valuable features of this solution are the cost optimizer and partition exchanges.""I've never faced any stability issues with the product. I don't recall any bugs, glitches, or crashes. I'd say it's fairly stable and shouldn't cause anyone issues in that regard.""Overall, from a technical perspective, the solution is very strong.""We find technical support to be very responsive. They briefly describe everything on phone and we handle the operations. I'd say we've been more than satisfied with their level of service. They're quite helpful and knowledgeable."

More Oracle Database Pros »

Cons
"I would like to see better support for advanced analytics.""It would be helpful to have more querying tools and more development tools for us to work easily with Microsoft.""End-to-end encryption specifically is something the solution needs to have in the next release.""The ease of use, or ease of management, could be improved.""The licensing fees can be reduced.""The price should be lower.""In terms of improvements, IBM Db2 can improve its interface and its functionality. Also, the embedded functions should be much richer than the current ones - the functions which are embedded in the engine itself.""There could be better integration with some cloud solutions."

More IBM Db2 Database Cons »

"The product is very expensive.""The documentation needs improvement because as it is now, providing support is a headache.""The price tag is very high and most cannot afford it.""Cheap and easy solutions for startups need to be made available.""The cost of this solution needs to be improved.""It could be slightly more intuitive, but other than that, we really like it as a solution.""The database environment needs to be cheaper. By making it less expensive, Oracle would be more competitive with other database vendors.""We don't really find that any features are lacking."

More Oracle Database Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""We don't see what the specific price of the DB2 license is because we pay for the backup license as a package.""I think that everyone knows that with IBM the standard price is higher than the others.""Db2 is less expensive than Oracle.""We did not buy it. It came with our hardware without any complimentary maintenance. If I compare Db2 Database with Oracle Database, its price is lower than Oracle Database.""There is a license for this solution and we pay every three years.""Among Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle, and Db2, Microsoft SQL Server is the cheapest one, and Oracle is the most expensive one. Db2 is in the middle. As compared to SQL Server, its price could go down. It will be good for customers.""We normally handle large size businesses and as far as I am aware, the license is negotiable based on the number of users and the quantitative data."

More IBM Db2 Database Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Our licensing costs are between $40,000 and $50,000 per year. Those are the costs that cover maintenance and licensing.""The pricing is something that Oracle should work on to make the product more affordable, especially to businesses in third-world countries.""It is very expensive. We pay in dollars, so the inflation and conversion cost is also there for us. They charge on a yearly basis for the license.""Its price is already low. Oracle has a competitive and cheaper price as compared to others. Oracle Cloud is cheaper than other clouds. The pricing is very competitive for Oracle Cloud to be in the market. Their pricing makes customers interested in using this product even though Oracle doesn't have a local data center at this moment.""They are pricing themselves out of the market.""It is expensive.""It's expensive. I would say that it is more expensive than other competing products.""It's not cheap, but sometimes, you get what you pay for."

More Oracle Database Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases solutions are best for your needs.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Answers from the Community
Nurit Sherman
author avatarit_user100737 (Architect)
Real User

Both DB2 and Oracle are legacy relational databases. 20+ years ago you might pick DB2 for reliability and scalability, but today you would choose Oracle for the sheer size of partners, applications, skills and tools available. So if you have to pick today, I would choose Oracle (I am an ex IBM DB2 Lab person and used to be VERY DB2 bias as it's an excellent engine)... and if I ask you more detailed application and business landscape questions I would recommend decommissioning BOTH those legacy databases and move to PostgreSQL, MariaDB or MySQL (MySQL is ironically now owned by Oracle too), and cloud host your database farm. If you had to pick a legacy "perpetual license" relational database I would go wall to wall MS SQLServer. That's what I would generally recommend without knowing more about your application or business landscape. (SAP, Apps, Mobility, Cloud, Regulatory, Security, HA, Scale, etc etc).

author avatarRehana Parvin
Real User

I think -- Oracle is well known for its performance and security feature and continuous efforts to reach the highest level of performance.
A few comparisons are given below:
1. Oracle has multi version read consistency -- but not in DB2
2. In oracle, neither read nor write blocks each other-- DB2 -read blocks write and write blocks read
3. No Dead locks under load in Oracle whereas deadlock is a serious problem in DB2
4. In Oracle --intelligent advisories such as SQL Tuning, Index, Summary, MTTR but in DB2 only Index advisory presents. In terms of Self-tuning capabilities-- Oracle has Automatic Performance Diagnosis, Automatic SQL Tuning , Self-tuning memory, free space, and I/O management and so on but in DB2 No equivalent or limited capabilities
Besides all good features exist in Oracle but it is bit complex. When problem occurs then figuring out the right problem in a very short time has become a challenge, Also Oracle is bit expensive.
There are a lot more difference. I think you can find good resource by searching online.
I think all database software has their own advantages and disadvantages. Depending on the budget and compromises in which feature loss they can afford--companies decide their choices.


author avatarTs Nurul Haszeli
Real User

DB2 versus Oracle:
- Table structure is different


- Data structures - there are some differences including the data type, format and length.

author avatarSydney Chidambaram
Consultant

I have worked on both, I kind of agree and disagree with the first repsonse, Both are very stable databases, I work currently on Oracle, and have worked for 20 years on DB2 on I-series and S38.
Both have its place, it is totally dependant on your requirement. However DB2 is shipped free with the IBM platform, oracle comes at a cost.

Your business requirement and the person in charge of your IT systems should be able to tell you which one would suit your business, All the other databases mentioned can also do the job.

A full business analysis will need to be done to understand where your business is now and what the future expectation is so that you can make the best choice.

author avatarit_user783555 (Data Architect at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees)
Real User

IBM DB2 is a real legacy system database, that is use in old companies like
telecom, its really couple with the mainframes of IBM really robust but
wasn't build with the internet in mind Oracle on the other hand is a more
modern Database it has more use cases and it also super robust but really
expensive (both are fore big companies) the main differences is that Oracle
runs on normal Linux box and DB2 has to work on a IBM mainframe ... the
language is more dynamic and modern in oracle

hope this helps a bit what is better is alway a "it depends on what you
want to build" for me I think a more modern noSQL data base is better in
this post internet and cloud era

author avatarit_user473562 (Senior Oracle Consultant at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees)
Consultant

Few more differences......
While IBM mainframe DB2 has a decades-long head start on the mainframe, UDB and Oracle are in a head to head competition for implementing a vast array of security features.
Oracle offers the integrated APEX development platform and SQL*Forms.
Oracle has the Procedural language SQL (PL/SQL) vs. DB2 UDB with their SQL Procedural language (SQL/PL).
Both UDB and Oracle offer a host of HA features for continuous availability. Oracle offers RAC clusters for shared database, plus replication solution vs. Oracle Streams, Oracle Data Guard and Oracle advanced multi-master replication.
While both UDB and Oracle have ANSI standard SQL, vendors have a strong incentive to add "extensions", such as Oracle with their unique DECODE operator.
Both UDB and Oracle are struggling to incorporate automated features to make database administration easier and more automated. For Oracle we see automated storage management (ASM), automated memory management (AMM), and automated database diagnostic management (ADDM).
A critical area of database management, both UDB and Oracle offer backup and recovery features. Within Oracle's Recovery Manager (RMAN), we see block-level backups and hot backups.

author avatarit_user5532 (Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees)
Real User

Well if you are asking for my opinion I will give it to you - I prefer DB2 over Oracle in most cases - Oracle has some weird data type inconsistencies like with timestamps, dates and variable fields.  I think DB2 seems to be faster for general transactions in most cases but of course, it all depends on the horses on the server underneath them.  I learned databases in a shot that had both DB2 and Oracle and DB2 was by far the easier to use and work with.  Over the years both have evolved to be bigger faster and more powerful, but I like the db2 manager which can help troubleshoot stuff much like the SQL manager can and I think it is easier to use than the Oracle version.  It really comes down to preference as I know some Oracle guys who prefer Oracle over DB2 but I think they hate IBM so they are biased as well.  I have always had better support from IBM than Oracle and that's a big deal for most folks.  As for the big difference between them I believe is the hashing algorithm each uses to do storage, retrieval, and indexing.  I just like IBM better for those things. 

author avatarit_user118071 (Engineer at a hospitality company with 1,001-5,000 employees)
Real User

So many differences and in almost many perspectives.

Short answer,
Compared to DB2, Oracle is clear winner. Oracle is far ahead than DB2 offerings. And also ready for future. But in my personal opinion, Microsoft SQL Server beats even Oracle.

I am sure you will many links online. So dont want to repeat that.

Thanks.

Questions from the Community
Top Answer: DB2 versus Oracle: - Table structure is different - Data structures - there are some differences including the data type, format and length.
Top Answer: The solution has very good data compression of up to 50%. For example, if you have 50 terabytes of data, it can be reduced to 25 terabytes.
Top Answer: We normally handle large size businesses and as far as I am aware, the license is negotiable based on the number of users and the quantitative data.
Top Answer: I like the design of the database because it works well. I also like the stability of the solution.
Top Answer: We have a yearly license, and it could be cheaper.
Top Answer: The licensing cost could be better.
Ranking
5th
Views
9,790
Comparisons
6,722
Reviews
17
Average Words per Review
501
Rating
7.7
2nd
Views
15,460
Comparisons
10,160
Reviews
72
Average Words per Review
439
Rating
8.4
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
DB2
Oracle 12c, RDBMS
Learn More
Overview
DB2 Enterprise for Linux, UNIX, and Windows is the ideal data server for the most demanding workloads. New XML support is designed to help firms minimize the time and effort it takes to persist and use their XML data reducing development costs and improving business agility.

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

Offer
Learn more about IBM Db2 Database
Learn more about Oracle Database
Sample Customers
Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto
Agncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.A
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm42%
Insurance Company16%
University11%
Manufacturing Company11%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company29%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm9%
Insurance Company7%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Computer Software Company14%
Government9%
Comms Service Provider8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company33%
Comms Service Provider19%
Financial Services Firm9%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business30%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise59%
REVIEWERS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise57%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise58%
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Database and other solutions. Updated: July 2021.
522,693 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM Db2 Database is ranked 5th in Relational Databases with 18 reviews while Oracle Database is ranked 2nd in Relational Databases with 78 reviews. IBM Db2 Database is rated 7.8, while Oracle Database is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM Db2 Database writes "Almost maintenance-free and less expensive, but lacking in the area of development tools and resources". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "Gets the job done, doesn't fail, and suitable for massively scalable applications". IBM Db2 Database is most compared with SQL Server, MySQL, SAP HANA, Teradata and IBM Netezza Performance Server, whereas Oracle Database is most compared with SAP HANA, SQL Server, MySQL, Teradata and MariaDB. See our IBM Db2 Database vs. Oracle Database report.

See our list of best Relational Databases vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.