Oracle Database vs SQL Server

Oracle Database is ranked 1st in Relational Databases with 71 reviews vs SQL Server which is ranked 3rd in Relational Databases with 28 reviews. The top reviewer of Oracle Database writes "It provides reliability, in terms of handling large volumes of data". The top reviewer of SQL Server writes "Just like a Windows PC needs basic defragmentation maintenance to run effectively, SQL Server needs its own regular maintenance". Oracle Database is most compared with IBM DB2, SQL Server and Tibero. SQL Server is most compared with SAP IQ, Teradata and Oracle Database. See our Oracle Database vs SQL Server report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
E6406859 e328 4990 a27b 2bf1abff976c avatar
reviewer125703
Oracle database vs. sql server report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database vs SQL Server and others in Relational Databases.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing Oracle Database vs SQL Server

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
It is flexible, scalable, and a true Enterprise RDBMS.High availability using real application clusters.It gives DB consistency, supports disaster recovery (DR), is tunable, and handles large DB sizes.You can install Oracle Database software, patching, and create/configure Oracle databases in silent using scriptsPerformance is the best key value. Oracle provides Exadata, the engineered system designed for Oracle Database, where you can achieve maximum performance.Significant assistance in tuning both the migration process and the production database was provided by Oracle Consulting Services, which provided excellent and very professional advice.It provided better insight and diagnostics when data problems were encountered by the application.RAC clustering allowed us to improve performance and provided additional redundancy.

Read more »

Enables us to convert to bigger DBs and more easily move or upgrade between branches.Without any doubt the Integration Services and Analysis Services are the most widely used. These are the basis for data quality, data gathering, ETL process, as well as collation for the data warehouse, Cube-generation, and ad-hoc processes. The ease in which you may mold a process flow or even modularly add in new structures is something which is much needed in my job.It's a very capable, efficient, price-performant OLAP server.SSAS is the most interesting feature to organize the data and let the users play with it.If backups and alerts are configured properly, I can also rely on my restoration plan.It is quite reliable in cluster configurations and has helped me to reduce downtime and improve SLAs.Comparing with other database management systems that I tried in other companies, SQL Server is quite easy to install, configure, and maintain.You could have an offsite and an onsite, and if the onsite goes down, the offsite picks it up. I like that flexibility to provide continuing operations.

Read more »

Cons
Auditing could be improved, especially granular auditing. The unified audit trail in 12c is great, however its extraction in a highly busy environment is quite a challenge.The compression does not give much value-add or provide performance benefits as was highlighted.Cloud installations using Oracle are not supported by SAP.​​​Upgrade is the most critical phase for the lifecycle of a database. In order to be sure that the migration succeeds, you need to be up-to-date. Therefore, regularly install the patchset and security updates.Be informed of the known issues using My Oracle Support.​Initial setup was complex because of the odd way the application used the database, the application vendor's conversion tools, and our stringent requirements.

Read more »

From a DB administrator perspective, I would like to see more space requirements and space capacity history, so that we are able to see which DBs are growing, and by how much per day or week.An area for improvement would be the SQL Server process monitoring, which is quite basic and could sustain more information.The only item which I can list is application failure during Integration Services debugging, when restarting a process flow. In a number of instances the solutions fails. I have not given this much thought and simply stop and start the debugging service rather than restarting.The web interface and the command line interface could be better so we could manage and build some things around an API. If we could build our own solution, our own interface, and then manage the solution through that open API, that would be better.For a big amount of data, when we are speaking about IoT Segments, and Big Data projects, there are performance issues.The reporting services of the solution (SSRS and now Power BI) are the less valuable items of the SQL Server suite.I would appreciate a dark theme for SQL Server Management Studio and ability to add databases with TDE enabled into availability groups.It pesters you to update the Client every month when there is nothing new that you really need to add, but it is constantly pestering you. I do not care for it.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
​The license cost need to be optimized. The licensing cost is very high compared to other RDBMS.Be prepared to pay for consulting services, and do not underestimate the time required to find and hire good quality database administrators.

Read more »

My advice is quite straightforward. If you know the number of users who really and truly need access to the Server then it is a no-brainer. If you do not know, then get the basic package and minimum licenses and start from there. Needless to say, users can develop/use data structures outside and then deploy onto the Server.The price has been going higher and higher. The market is quite price sensitive.This is a downside of enterprise Microsoft products.Currently, almost all of my machines are in Azure and I think it is the best way of licensing now (VM+software).​We are a Microsoft shop, so we use Active Directory. That integrates well with this product, but we did look at Oracle. We also looked at IBM. This was the best price point for us for what we were getting.​​It has the easiest licensing.The free version is cumbersome to use and maintain. But $5000 for a licence is more expense than the benefit I would get from a licensed version. A licence might be worth the price to simplify management and speed up searches.

Read more »

Oracle database vs. sql server report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database vs SQL Server and others in Relational Databases.
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
29,225
Comparisons
8,050
Reviews
78
Followers
880
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
15,880
Comparisons
10,282
Reviews
28
Followers
1,022
Avg. Rating
8.6
Top Comparisons
Top Comparisons
Ibm
Compared 24% of the time.
Microsoft 400x400
Compared 16% of the time.
Tmaxsoft logo
Compared 11% of the time.
See more Oracle Database competitors »
Sap065658 logo 300x300 0r 01
Compared 19% of the time.
Teradata
Compared 17% of the time.
Jt hjyjg 400x400
Compared 12% of the time.
See more SQL Server competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsOracle 12c, RDBMSMicrosoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
Website/Video
Website/VideoOracle
  • Vendor 7751 screenshot 1524945170
Microsoft
  • Vendor 7622 screenshot 1524943927
OverviewQuestionmark icon
Overview

Oracle Database 12c introduces a new multitenant architecture that makes it easy to consolidate many databases quickly and manage them as a cloud service. Oracle Database 12c also includes in-memory data processing capabilities for breakthrough analytical performance. Additional database innovations deliver new levels of efficiency, performance, security, and availability. Oracle Database 12c comes in two editions to fit your business needs and budget: Enterprise Edition and Standard Edition 2.

For more information on Oracle RDBMS, visit Oracle.com

SQL Server is the Microsoft-driven relational database management system. This system is used to store data as well as retrieve it when necessary; these functions can be supported by individual users or by multiple users within a larger network. The Microsoft SQL Server has warehousing options, quality and integration services, management tools that are simple to implement, as well as robust tools for development.

Looking at the more technical end of things, Microsoft SQL Server uses query languages such as T-SQL and ANSI SQL. Disaster recovery is one of the product's most prominent features, in addition to in-memory performance, scalability, and corporate business intelligence capabilities.

OFFER
Learn more about Oracle Database
Learn more about SQL Server
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersAgncia Nacional de guas, Anbima, Aria Systems, Asiana Airlines, Astelit LLC, Australian Finance Group, Banco Occidental de Descuento, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, BT, Caja de Seguros S.A., Casas GEO S.A.B. de C.V., Comic Relief UK, Corsair Components Inc., CSAM Health AS, CSOB Group, Datacraft Solutions, DenizBank A.S., Department of Treasury and Finance WA, Office of State Revenue, Deutsche B_rse AG, Deutsche Lufthansa AG, Deutsche Messe AG, Digicel Haiti, DPR COSEA, Essar Group, Essatto Software Pty Ltd, Farmšcia e Drogaria Nissei Ltda., Fomento Econ‹mico Mexicano S.A.B. de C.V. (FEMSA), FundaÊo Petrobras de Seguridade Social, Future Group, GFKL Financial Services AG, Grupo Posadas S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Sinosserra, Guerra S.A. Implementos Rodovišrios, Hanatour International Service, Hays plc, Henan Mobile Co. Ltd, Hochschule Hof, Hong Kong and China Technology (Wuhan) Co. Ltd (Towngas Technology), Industries Corpa_al C.A., Infrastructure Development Finance Company Limited, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatstica, Instituto Mexicano de la Propiedad Industrial, Kcell, LinkShare Corporation, MercadoLibre Inc., MetLife Inc., Nextgen Distribution, €BB-IKT GmbH, Octagon Research Solutions, Pacific Lutheran University, Paragon Data GmbH, Ping ltd., PJSC Trustbank, Prodaub _ Processamento de Dados de Uberl_ndia, Purdue University, Redknee Inc., Robi Axiata Limited, Shanghai Infoservice Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai Sihua Technologies Co. Ltd, Sistema de Aguas de la Ciudad de M_xico, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Suddenlink Communications, Suprajit Engineering Limited, Tallink Grupp, Terminales Ro de la Plata S.A., Therap Services LLC, Think Passenger Inc., Trafigura, Transmed S.A.L Lebanon, ValeShop, VelQuest Corporation, Vodafone Group plc, West Virginia Network, WIND Hellas Telecommunications S.AMicrosoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Top IndustriesQuestionmark icon
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
14%
Government
11%
Software R&D Company
9%
Insurance Company
8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
24%
Media Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
REVIEWERS
Software R&D Company
14%
Transportation Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Retailer
10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Transportation Company
6%
Non Tech Company
6%
Company SizeQuestionmark icon
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
11%
Midsize Enterprise
22%
Large Enterprise
67%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
18%
Midsize Enterprise
24%
Large Enterprise
58%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
32%
Midsize Enterprise
34%
Large Enterprise
34%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
42%
Midsize Enterprise
20%
Large Enterprise
38%
Oracle database vs. sql server report from it central station 2018 05 04 thumbnail
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Database vs SQL Server and others in Relational Databases.
Download now
270,274 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Relational Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email