Compare IBM FlashSystem vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: June 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The integration is already included in the license cost of IBM FlashSystem. The integration is very easy. You get the IBM storage core with all software, firmware, and upgrades. EMC provides the features in the box, but they are not free for customers. There is a licensing cost for features. We have yearly licensing, but IBM has also provided a new option where you pay as you go. They provide a big box, and I pay, for example, for 10 terabytes. If I exceed 10 terabytes, IBM will charge for the new storage after 10 terabytes. It is a good opportunity in the market for using the storage as a cloud and paying as you go.""They've been much more aggressive in the last five, six years than they were before that.""This is an expensive product and if the price were reduced it would be better.""Among IBM, Dell EMC, and Pure Storage, IBM is the cheapest. The price is also based on our location, the size of our entity, and our regular annual purchases from them. We are a very big IBM customer, so we normally get very high discounts. We are not a big customer of Pure Storage. We don't buy that much from Pure Storage per year. Everything is included in the price. There is no extra license for different functions.""Its price is very good.""I find the pricing of the solution to be very reasonable.""You purchase it as a bundle and the price is comparable.""The solution requires a license and could be less expensive."

More IBM FlashSystem Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: The most valuable features are flexibility and performance.
Top Answer: The solution requires a license and could be less expensive.
Top Answer: The Data Reduction Pools (DRP) support could be better.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
16,351
Comparisons
12,660
Reviews
19
Average Words per Review
492
Rating
8.1
Views
1,206
Comparisons
983
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
IBM Storwize
Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
Learn More
Overview

IBM FlashSystem products are enterprise computer data storage systems that store data on flash memory chips. Unlike storage systems that use standard solid-state drives, IBM FlashSystem products incorporate custom hardware based on technology from the 2012 acquisition of Texas Memory Systems. This hardware provides performance, reliability, and efficiency benefits versus competitive offerings.

Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance integrates the cloud into its core architecture, making cloud storage available to all users and access protocols while eliminating on-premises cloud access licensing charges and the need for external gateways. Built using a powerful SMP design, multi-threaded OS, massive DRAM caches, and all flash storage, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance powers the most demanding applications, from fast query responses and, rapid transaction processing to virtualization and cloud workloads. With these performance levels, you can easily achieve 4:1 consolidation of your current NAS filers and gain a higher return on your storage investment.

Offer
Learn more about IBM FlashSystem
Learn more about Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance
Sample Customers
Celero, Friedhelm Loh Group, Clarks, Mingkang Natregro Health Food Group, Sofia, Etisalat Fights Fraud, UF Health Shands Hospital, Generali, Elecon Engineering Company Limited, Ventiv , Technology, CPFL Energia, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd., SciQuest, Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Consolidated, Paddy Power, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Interconnect Services, Severstal IP-Only AB, PVU Group GmbH
Translational Genomics Research Institute, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, CyberSolutions Inc., Y-Telecom, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Mutlinet Pakistan, TDC A/S, Digi-Key Corporation, Thurgau Cantonal Bank
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm35%
Government14%
Comms Service Provider11%
Healthcare Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider26%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company44%
Comms Service Provider20%
Manufacturing Company6%
Government6%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business38%
Midsize Enterprise14%
Large Enterprise48%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business19%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise60%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, IBM, NetApp and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). Updated: June 2021.
521,637 professionals have used our research since 2012.

IBM FlashSystem is ranked 2nd in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 19 reviews while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). IBM FlashSystem is rated 8.2, while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of IBM FlashSystem writes "Simple licensing, good performance, and easy to use and administer". On the other hand, IBM FlashSystem is most compared with Pure Storage FlashArray, Dell EMC Unity XT, HPE Nimble Storage, Dell EMC PowerStore and HPE 3PAR StoreServ, whereas Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is most compared with NetApp FAS Series, HPE 3PAR StoreServ, Nutanix Acropolis AOS, HPE StorageWorks MSA and Huawei Symantec OceanSpace S5000.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.