We performed a comparison between NetApp FAS Series and Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, IBM, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)."The most important features are SnapVault, Snapshots, and SnapMirror."
"Can use both SAN and NAS at the same time."
"It is good to have a unified storage where you can have block and file level protocols."
"Compression of the backup Oracle by RMAN on NFS saves space 5:1."
"The support is very good."
"The most valuable features are the NAS features and NetApp's excellent support."
"The migration of the volume on the cluster is very useful and easy to use."
"The SnapMirror is a good tool because, as long as you're going NetApp to NetApp, it's ultimately the fastest way to move data. We replicate everything to another site for disaster recovery."
"I like its storage capacity, quick access to the data, speed, and overall storage management."
"There are some technical limitations, but it would be great to have in-line deduplication and in-line compression for the FAS series as well."
"The solution's configuration is not flexible."
"The solution can improve on the replication features."
"The only downside is in ease in management; it is not easy to use."
"Technical support needs to be improved, as there are no longer partners in our country."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern, so from an improvement perspective, the tool needs to be made cheaper."
"The adoption of flash by NetApp has also been lagging behind the trendsetters, like TMS, Nimble, and others."
"The solution could do more than just data."
"The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem."
More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
NetApp FAS Series is ranked 1st in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 98 reviews while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is ranked 8th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). NetApp FAS Series is rated 8.8, while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NetApp FAS Series writes "Offers good performance and ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance writes "A stable unified storage system that enables quick access to data". NetApp FAS Series is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp AFF, HPE StorageWorks MSA, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Dell PowerStore, whereas Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is most compared with Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), IBM FlashSystem, HPE 3PAR StoreServ and Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.